this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14432 readers
714 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So, an adult?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 389aaa@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Thank you for typing this all up, it makes me feel like I'm losing it how nobody seems to be bothered with this at all.

I'm newly in the same age range and it's baffling to me how the 'real adult' cultural age marker seems to be a target that's constantly just out of reach. I'm honestly concerned people will start thinking anyone below 30 is a child and should thereby have no rights, at this point.

[–] OffSeasonPrincess@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

is a child and should thereby have no rights

Most ppl refuse to acknowledge that the fact the vast majority of children dont rly have rights or agency in their lives is already massively fucked up, and will only recognize it as such when an adult is treated the way kids are

(We dont mean kids should date adults obvsly, we wouldnt bother w this stupid disclaimer normally but since the post itself is abt dating in this case we wanna make that clear)

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm honestly concerned that people will start thinking anyone below 40 is a child who doesn't deserve rights!

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Indigenous peoples and minorities of all ages have been infantikized and denied agency and rights, so the playbook seems very similar to me. In general, I believe the goal (or the trend, rather) is to deny agency to anyone who doesn't belong to the owner class, so their lives can be controlled economically and with violence, like many children's are.

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

Absolutely, absolutely. Very important addition!

[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I could legit see boomer establishment dems wanting to raise the voting age to 40 or 50

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Making 35 year olds old enough to run for president while also being too young to vote for president would be a very good bit.

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s the most extreme example but you need to be 35 to run for president, when I’d trust a random 25 year old over a random 75 year old any day of the week

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I CAN NAME AT LEAST ONE 27 YEAR OLD WHO I KNOW WOULD MAKE A GOOD LEADER OF HIS COUNTRY………

February 1970 photo of Muammar Gaddafi in Belgrade, Yugoslavia, a few months after the 1969 Libyan revolution. He would've been around 27 or 28 at the time.

CAN I GET A "TAMAAM, SAYYIDI"?!

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Castro was 32 when the Cuban Revolution ended, Che was 30. Sankara was 33.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

What am I doing with my life? kitty-birthday-sad

[–] OffSeasonPrincess@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

Actually Sankara was 9 when the cuban revolution ended☝️🤓

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

and it's baffling to me how the 'real adult' cultural age marker seems to be a target that's constantly just out of reach.

In my mid 30s and I feel the exact same way, it's always been a moving set of goalposts.