this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
1124 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

86864 readers
3232 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The products covered by the obligation to repair currently include:

  • washing machines and washer-dryers
  • dishwashers
  • refrigerators
  • electronic displays
  • welding equipment
  • servers and data storage products
  • mobile phones, cordless phones and tablets
  • tumble dryers 
  • e-bikes and e-scooters batteries (from 18 February 2027)
  • local space heaters
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 125 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Hopefully this will benefit other countries indirectly, instead of designing one repairable phone and one not repairable, should be easier to just design one.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 104 points 3 days ago (39 children)

"Hold my beer" - Nintendo, releasing an EU centric revision. Meanwhile Apple and Samsung are digging up every legal loophole to prevent the law applying to their devices.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apple and Samsung be like: "It's not a mobile phone or a tablet, it's a phablet so it does not fall in to any category of the devices that need to be repairable."

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The loophole in the directive is smaller phones. Smartphones go from 10.16 cm (4 inches) diagonal to 17. 78cm (7 inches) and everything bigger (up to 44.2 cm) is a tablet.

Samsung and Apple's flagship smartphones are very close to be considered tablets but that wouldn't save them from the requriments.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Apple: hey fans, did you know the best phone is actually small?!!

load more comments (38 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So I saw that my car offered up all sorts of useful diagnostic information for self diagnosing stuff. Was very excited and went to look at it for a generic fault without having to get software to tell me what the fault is. I thought "it's stupid it has fully functional computer display yet tells me basically "contact a dealer, but it's safe to drive" instead of what the problem is. Then I find out that because I'm in the USA, the company keeps it to themselves...

So if they see value in treating regions differently, they will absolutely go out of their way to screw over the regions that will let them.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Car manufacturers screwed over consumers the last 10-15 years big time! Cars used to be the big thing many could fix a lot on by themselves and were proud to do so. Then they basically just said incrementally to the DIY'ers "it's all computers now, not your cup of tea", purposely made cars less and less self repairable and got away with it! It's infuriating.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Computers could make cars a lot more reliable and moddable. It's proprietary/locked-down software and hardware that's the problem.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmygarden@lemmy.today 18 points 2 days ago (17 children)

The past two phones I bought were not because they broke, but because they stopped being supported on apps that I need to use.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's also included in the directive. Manufactures will be required to provide OS updates for at least 5 years "from the date of end of placement on the market" (which means the date the brand shipped the last device of a model).

They also have 4 months to release security updates and 6 months for functionality updates see ANNEX II for all device categories.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is actually fairly reasonable. I use a 5 yr old Xiaomi which a has 8Gb (as much as an entry level Surface or MacBook. Fuck AI) an octacore CPU, great camera, ultra fast charge, great battery etc. But I realize most people change phones every 2-3 years regardless of how well their phone works, because of "shiny new thing"

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

10T. Banger of a phone.

Actually pretty repairable despite the glued back.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

So frigging good value it's insane. Have had like the 2,5,7,8,9(kids) too, all super quality and cheap.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just like the USB-c on the iphone

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even then, Apple maliciously complied. They put shit speed usb-c, (maybe 2.0?) on all but the highest most expensive model.

[–] Dyf_Tfh@piefed.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Tbf they also did that when they were on lightning.

And they are not the only one to do that. I have a flagship android phone one step before the super flagship but It only got usb 2. It is really annoying to transfer media at such a low speed.

[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've read a couple stories of companies (planning to) release EU-only models there, but non-EU-compliant ones everywhere else.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

The EU ones will become a lot more valuable on second hand markets...

load more comments (1 replies)