this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
20 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
14531 readers
810 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Separating home is unnecessary these days with btrfs, Fedora for example will let you reinstall while preserving /home/.
I generally feel more comfortable having /home as a separate partition. It makes editing my partitions with external tools like gparted very easy, and I can just wipe /root whenever I like without having to think too much about. Also, are we considering btrfs to be reliable now? Last time I looked at it, it was still in the prototype/unstable phase and I chose ZFS for my server instead.
Another reason I keep /home separate is that I have systems with multiple Linux versions installed. Each has their own /root, and they share /boot, /swap and /home.
It's the default for fedora, ubuntu, opensuse, cachyos, so i'd say yes, or at least it's feature set is worth it's "unstability".
This would work just fine with mount points on btrfs, probably not on a regular distro as you can't usually customize them like this, but on a terminal based install like arch? not a problem.