politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Im sorry if I infered things from what you said. But, I am frustrated with the hoops people jump through to avoid discussing class conflict. You haven't once responded to the points I've made about class conflict and class consciousness. You just said "I'm overcomplicating it" rather than attempt to understand what was being said.
I'm not sure if you're purposely avoiding it. Or, more likely, you're just not understanding what is being said and you're filling it in with your own misunderstanding. But I'm not talking about "the rich" like they need to just pay more taxes and shits good. I'm talking about class not wealth. And more importantly, how that class structure gives only one class access to influence government (power).
I agree, online conversations like this are frustrating. But, you have now multiple times ignored my discussion of class and replaced it with things I didn't say. Instead you appealed to tribalism, calling people racist, or acting like I'm discussing a conspiracy. Nothing of which I've said.
If you want to push back on a perspective someone has, you should probably understand that perspective first. Because it's entirely based on class conflict. Something you've refused to respond to. I would have thought that was obvious from "capitalist Epstein class" that I mentioned in my literal first comment.
Fair enough. My comment was about people constantly calling everything "a distraction" from one specific crime. The article isn't really meaningful to the comment I made. So not really a part of any of the discussion.
I would say you don't understand what point I'm making because you are the very type of person lacking class consciousness that my initial comment was frustrated about.
I'm wasn't really trying to educate anyone with it. It was more venting a frustration.
I'm sorry if I was defensive in my responses. Its usually right wing reactionaries trying to point away from class conflict to something else. It would be better if you have a specific question about what I said. Rather than me trying to "explain connections". That's too vague to really answer.
Man, that's a lot of words to say "I don't actually want to learn what you're talking about".
It's not rude to point out what another person may not understand. That's not stupidity. That's lacking knowledge.
Stupidity is when someone is addressed with something they do not understand, take it as a personal attack, and then decide they would rather not waste their time to ask a single question.
You wouldn't look stupid if you asked me something simple like "what do you mean by class?" I'd be very happy to clarify my definition of the word and move forward from there.
But it seems you are too stubborn to do anything simple like that. You'd rather be upset by a condescending tone that I can't help but let out. If there is something I'm guilty of its definitely that.
Edit: Damn, when they delete all their comments.