this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
192 points (98.0% liked)

Buy European

10620 readers
57 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] huppakee@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Ok, so a question i keep on having about this. It seems like there is two flavours: this is awesome because it will protect children or this is terrible because we will have to give out our data to untrustworthy parties all the time. I can very easily see how this is a bad thing that should be prevented. What i cannot see is if there is any possible middle-ground. Are there places where this is implemented reasonably well / could there be a way to have the best of both worlds? I am personally not a fan of being against something in it's entirety, whish there was like a reasonable compromise on this.

[โ€“] fonix232@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It won't protect children because it still allows unidentified adults access to children.

It does however threaten people's privacy as you now need to identify yourself to access certain sites, sites that pinkie promise not to use your personal data but actually can only operate by selling said data. Now tied to your ID. Name, photo, everything.

[โ€“] huppakee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I understand, didn't mean to imply their argument is valid. Just thinking that if there was a reasonable form of identification the unreasonable options are instantly less attractive.

[โ€“] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Don't be so easily misled.

The bad options are INTENTIONALLY pushed by corporate backing.

[โ€“] ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

How does it protect children?

[โ€“] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can't verify age without exposing identity, so there's no good way to implement it. Any supposed benefits are massively outnumbered by drawbacks.

[โ€“] okamiueru@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can't verify age without exposing identity

Of course you can.

This is exactly the same mechanism required as is used for token authorization.

The entity verifying your identity needs to be trusted to do so, and it gives you a proof of age category (doesn't need to be exact age, so it shouldn't give that), that the service then can validate.

A government service that already knows who you are, can validate your identity and hand out these tokens, which are then used to access said restricted services. Done correctly and neither need to know who accessed what.

But, this isn't done that way. Because, this isn't about protecting children. It's about collecting data and building profiles.

Exactly this.

Doing it this way however prevents Palantir getting their hands on the data and slinging their kickbacks

[โ€“] huppakee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any supposed benefits are massively outnumbered by drawbacks.

That seems obvious far yes. The downvotes i'm getting seem to imply i am not getting that.

I suspect the downvotes are from people fed up with sea-lioning by bots. You seem genuine but there's a lot who aren't

[โ€“] Babalugats@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

What i cannot see is if there is any possible middle-ground.

Almost every campaign, or anti-loss of privacy article or site that is fighting against this sort of thing, shows examples of much better options that allow for protection of online shit for kids and other alike, while maintaining other users privacy. This is all about data, nothing else. Do not kid yourself otherwise.