this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
510 points (98.1% liked)

Privacy

10616 readers
201 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
iopq@lemmy.world
510
Reframing smart glasses as 'pervert glasses' (this.weekinsecurity.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by XLE@piefed.social to c/privacy@lemmy.world
163 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Smart glasses equipped with cameras, microphones, and AI are a creeping privacy and security nightmare, prompting backlash.

And rightfully so.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sen@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'd wear them if they didn't have a camera - the idea of a little screen and the music/phone call capabilities baked into something I have to wear every waking moment anyways actually sounds really nice. I'd probably turn off the display after the novelty wore off, but the audio alone is still worth it to me.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah the camera is the troublesome part. Thing is it is useful for camera tracking.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No way, microphone is much worse

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago

microphone has many more basic uses. taking notes. voice command. I mean we all realize all the smartphones have both of these things right. I mean that is why I don't really like them but I would more like AR although realistically not in a corp is controlling everything way. If it was open source and local and under my control that would be super cool.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Eh. It's already pretty easy to conceal a microphone. Harder to conceal a camera.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Actually something I worry about ….. my glasses have tiny embedded magnets for “click-on” sunglasses. Maybe they could be mistaken for tiny cameras on pervert glasses

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

It's actually pretty easy to conceal. there's plenty of investigative reporting with hidden cameras and nobody's none the wiser. The fact that they have to add a light to the glasses proves that even if you hide it in plain sight, people will still miss it.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Then why don't you buy the Bose ones?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Likely because they only do audio.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Don't think you read last line of their original message?

[–] sen@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bose needs to spend more on advertising, I'm the correct audience but I had no idea they made these.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Tell me if you need my info for finder's fee?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Even G2 is screen, audio and no camera. https://www.evenrealities.com/products/g2-a

[–] sen@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

I've never heard of these, will check them out