this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
326 points (99.1% liked)

Greentext

8381 readers
695 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The book has child porn in it. A group fuck where they all fuck the girl.

Not joking.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago

Describing it as porn is wildly inaccurate, it's not particularly detailed or explicit and it's not written in a way that even comes close to being erotic

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Today I learned everyone with a copy of the book 'It' is in possession of CSAM, and amazon and Barnes and noble are actively and criminally distributing the same material.

Words have meaning.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

At least in the US, I'm not sure if purely textual would ever be illegal. You could likely get away with a visual depiction of the scence with current law.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The Pedophile-in-Chief is ok with it, even though he personally prefers them to be teenaged, he'll gladly start a war and crash the global economy to defend him and his pedo pals from too much scrutiny in the Epstein files.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Pretty sure this is case law from like 70 years ago, but okay rant on