this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
144 points (99.3% liked)

Political Memes

12033 readers
1732 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

how should the world's economy develop? what companies should be developed? how should the profit be distributed? should it be illegal for companies to make a profit at all?

(note that i think that it is generally unavoidable that some companies make some profit, the grey area on the image of the supply-demand diagram (or rather quantity-price diagram) is the profit, and that would only be zero if all companies have exactly the same production costs per unit.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's stupid to fight against the way companies are structured.

You do realize the main aim of incorporation is to shield the officers from liability right?

The structure is how they stay out of jail. How, when we go to freeze assets there’s nothing there. The structure is an integral part of the crime.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Go take another look at what limited liability actually means. Because you don't seem to have understood the concept.

[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I definitely did nothing to deserve that tone. Either engage and explain or kindly eff the eff off.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

What can I say? The concepts on your comment are wrong, none of it works this way, and even deciding to talk about liability limitation in a criminal context is wrong.

You didn't understand what it's about.