Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
I'm an old guy. I usually go to my local grocery store when the kids get out from school for lunch. It gets really crowded in there and everyone is looking at the kids with suspicion while I'm shoving cans of beans and lunchmeat into my haversack.
I miss my brother. That's something he would have done. Lol
So shoplifting?
Also "old guy", you have kids in school, how old could you be?
He never said they were his kids. He just uses the local school to provide cover and plausible deniability.
Also taking food isn't theft or shoplifting.
Ah now I get it. 😄
Uh, what? What is it then? It ain't legal for sure.
Legal \= Moral
Many laws are ok (don't drive without the seatbelt on) but you need to think it out yourself.
I already got my answer. It is shoplifting. I was just wondering what crime it was, technically speaking.
If you see someone taking food, no you didn't.
Grow some basic empathy.
I don't care if someone takes food.
I want to know what crime it is if it isn't shoplifting or theft.
If you want to go by the letter of the extremely immoral laws that govern our society it would be shoplifting. Calling it that allows people with no empathy to pass judgement and kick a victim of their precious system, while they are down.
It shouldn't be a crime. It should be a crime to starve someone by underpayment of wages.
Why can't both be crimes? There can be two wrongs in this equation. You shouldn't just take things. But you should also be able to afford to live if you have work, and also if you can't work. A society has failed you if you can't. Agreed.
Because one is a crime poor people do against rich people, and the other is a crime rich people do against poor people.
I doubt the owner of "my local grocery store" is a rich person.
Perhaps for your specific case. I was referring to the more general "supermarket food stealing" sort of situation.
Okay, I was talking about the topic in this thread.
To be perfectly clear, I care not one whit about legality. It was illegal to harbor Jews, Homosexuals, and Neurodivergent people in Germany in 1937-1945. It is currently illegal in places to give people who are waiting, for hours in the hot sun to vote, water bottles. It is illegal in places to give food to people experiencing homelessness. Not one of those laws has a shred of moral backing.
Jeez. I agree, but I wasn't going all that deep. I meant it isn't morally right, of course, and also not legal, so I was wondering what crime it is if not theft or shoplifting?
If he wasn't paid enough during his life to afford food, the morally wrong decision wasn't his.
Not everyone is a victim. Many are, but assuming someone is "morally right" to just take food without paying for it is also passing judgement. They could just be not willing to pay. A kleptomaniac e.g.
The only thing we can say is that we don't know until we know them and their life.