news
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
view the rest of the comments
I really don't see how this is even remotely plausible. The Iraq wars required months of build-up, and the US had the luxury of friendly countries willing to host its troops - the logistical capacity they used back then literally does not exist anymore, the bases in the region in which they would build up troops have been bombed to shit, and Iran has already shown what will happen to troop build-up efforts with all the hits they did on the Kurds. Even if they could somehow amass these troops and deploy them into Iran, "siege and destroy the missile cities" is a "don't siege Leningrad, take it immediately"-tier statement - there are dozens of missile cities, spread across all the provinces of Iran, a country nearly 3 times the size of France, with rugged mountainous terrain. How is the US going to deploy these troops all over Iran, and then support them over the course of the campaign? How is it going to get them out? A dozen more instances of something akin to that (alleged) rescue operation and the US is going to be down like a hundred aircraft. And what exactly would "destroying" the missile cities even entail? What equipment that troops flown in could bring with them could be used to thoroughly destroy entire tunnel networks like this? This is beyond horrific losses, it would be literally feeding men and irreplaceable airframes into an Iranian meat-grinder.
And they most definitely do not have the troops for a full occupation of Iran, they barely managed one of Iraq, having to lower recruitment standards, deploy a ton of National Guard units, stop-loss a whole bunch of guys, and that was with them having a bunch of coalition partners and allied Iraqi forces.