this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
582 points (92.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

10135 readers
3261 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au -1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You mean whats the issue with giving them a platform?

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No I mean what's the issue with them being verified

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nazis and their allies should not have a platform.

When blueksy verifies them, it tells you that bluesky is aware of their presence on their (private, centralized) platform and accepts it.

Thus, the verification requires allowing them to have a platform.

Since they should not have a platform, they should not be verified.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So it's not the verification itself that's a problem, but rather the platforming

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 1 day ago

You do not platform Nazis, let alone legitimise them with “verification”.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 day ago

Yes. And verification requires platforming, so transitively they shouldn't be verified.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Block and move on.

I subscribe to a bunch of blocklists so I’m pretty sure I won’t be seeing their “content” anyway.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't block Nazis on the system you own, you ban them outright.

These people are responsible for the death and murder of many and your response is to pretend they're not there next to you and let them spread their propaganda?? What the fuck is wrong with you.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Shadow banning works better than banning even in games

Let them in, put them in a room that nobody visits and let them rant there. Tell everyone that the room contains a crazy person.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They have a platform. It's a podium in the white house. It's having thousands of thugs pillaging, and likely soon raping in your neighborhoods.

Knowing what they say is relevant.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And you can go see what they say there, you don't invite them into your house to do it.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't wanna go to Twitter, ever, if I can help it.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You said the white house, not twitter. That content will already be distributed through traditional media.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s the United States government. The platform is implied and given by the people of the United States.

Until that ends… I’m not sure banning them from everywhere but x will make sense?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago

Any no government entity refusing to enable them is good.