this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
519 points (98.5% liked)

politics

31040 readers
1771 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Can we stop trying to beatify this psychopath? It's possible to be against violence and still condemn Kirk and his violent legacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] archonet@lemy.lol 81 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Dude literally died for what he believed in. We should be happy for him.

More than that, it's "worth it to have the cost" of everyone owning guns, so that we can have some fascist pricks die every so often.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Besides, empathy isn't real, its more of a new age belief. Luigi can be the patron saint of the righteous hand of justice. Charlie can be the patron saint of the self righteous receiver of justice

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's gonna get a whole lot worse before things get better, but they'll be remembered as some of the first, yes.

personally I'm of the opinion that society goes in cycles, generally, if you know history. We're either about to have civil war or mass revolt, I'm pretty sure -- when the circuses are still going but there is no bread, for millions, and it's only getting worse -- that's generally when shit gets real. Massive, massive oversimplification, mind you; but more and more people in the US are feeling the economic squeeze that republicans (and by extension also, late-stage capitalism) pile on more every year.

In other words, we're in the opening paragraphs to a very long chapter in some high schooler's history class on this period of American history in the future -- probably also lumped into an economics class with the 1929 stock market crash and the consequences thereof. How it will be written about I shudder to imagine, but you'll have a lot of "patron saints of fucking around/finding out/delivering unto thee the finding out".

[–] Frenchys_prospecting@aussie.zone 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I don't agree with the political violence (unless you're fighting back against it) but everyone in America that isn't a maga cult member should look at investing in more guns and gun handling training.

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I'm paraphrasing his quote on gun violence.

In a way, he's right -- this death? Worth it. Totally. I just wish it didn't come at the cost of many schoolchildren and other innocents before (and after) him.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So then, how do you reduce? Very simple. People say, oh, Charlie, how do you stop school shootings? I don't know. How did we stop shootings at baseball games? Because we have armed guards outside of baseball games. That's why. How did we stop all the shootings at airports? We have armed guards outside of airports. How do we stop all the shootings at banks? We have armed guards outside of banks. How did we stop all the shootings at gun shows?

Turns out those police officers and security couldn't keep Charlie Kirk alive.

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

On the other hand, in a sick and twisted way, this all does lend credence to the whole "good guy with a gun" idea. you can't tell me that microphone in his hand isn't a weapon, and you sure as shit can't tell me Charlie Kirk was a good guy.

In other words, this was justifiable self-defense, that sniper protected those college kids from a cognitohazard.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

I just watched the Behind the Bastards episode on the zyzzians and my brain immediately that Kirk was gonna start spouting off about Rokus Basilisk.

[–] Frenchys_prospecting@aussie.zone 2 points 11 months ago

Ahh ok. I gotcha

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Work for the world you want to live in, prepare for the world you already live in.

[–] Frenchys_prospecting@aussie.zone 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I didn't expect this shit to happen in my life time (a phrase uttered by many, no doubt) but here we are.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah, we ain't even rock bottom yet...

Like, it's past recommending "guns".

Everybody should legit be getting ARs/AKs and plated vests these days.

It doesn't take a lot of range time to get competent. Both platforms are very simple.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

He meant school children, not himself.