the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
view the rest of the comments
It's not that I disagree with the conclusions, hell, you gotta take out your enemies and obstacles to make things happen, but as someone who's not quite convinced that authoritarianism is the way to run things, it means I'd probably be offing myself before they send me to the concentration camp/gulag.
I won't deny that 1) authoritarianism is not a desirable tool to use and 2) authoritarian socialist states more often than not abused authoritarianism on behalf of the ruling elites. Nobody wants the press to be censored, to be interrogated by a counterintelligence agent, or anything like that. But when the alternative to this dreaded authority is a right-wing coup (Allende), leftist purges (Pinochet), and the rolling back of any socialist policies (Nazis decollectivized Soviet farms), then authoritarianism is really the better alternative. It's the paradox of tolerance.
Yes, this often results in abuse, and this is why it's up to us to create structures that let us wield state power while stopping power-hungry dictators from using it for their own needs. I personally don't really believe this is possible, since history seems to tell that as long as these mechanisms exist, they will be abused. But, the alternative to left-wing authoritarianism is right-wing authoritarianism. Pick your poison. I know what I choose.
I choose the Nordic model.
The nordic model is a failure, the last 30 years the social democrats have been responsible for 50% of austerity cuts and privatization in the Nordic countries.
The nordic model only exists as a middle point between existing socialism and capitalism, when the USSR fell that middle point dissapeared.