this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
1256 points (98.5% liked)
196
19597 readers
71 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Some will see this and think this is a sign of progress, that we are transitioning into a society where your genitals don't determine what toys you get to play with. Others will look at this and think the world is slipping in anarchy and moral decay.
There was moral outrage when faster, cheaper printing presses were invented because they were worried people wouldn't learn or memorize anything anymore if they could just write it down & it made literacy accessible to the common person.
I'm glad I wasn't sober when someone incidentally compared happy meal toys to the invention of movable type.
There was a moral panic in the 19th century where people were outraged that young girls from good families kept reading novels. They said it would lead to social self-isolation and bookishness and distract from apropriate activities like knitting, socialising, looking pretty and smiling.
And young women were thought to be largely unable to discern fact from fiction and hold their gentlemen callers to the same standards as the men in their novels. And you know, women having standards... the 18th century couldn't have that.
Jokes on them, both men and women now isolate themselves thanks to C.AI (=
The third group of us secretly want both toys
The rest of know it doesn’t matter, the toy will be broken or lost in the car by the next block!
I don’t think that’s a third group. I think it’s a subset of the first one.
Some of those "morals" need to decay.
I wish they just didn't give out crappy plastic toys at all.
anarchy and moral decay can’t happen at the same time
Eh; creative urge=destructive urge
Whats wrong with anarchy? Talk all the shit you like; it works better than kleptocracy or fascism.
Interesting question, is anarchy better than Kleptocracy? How does money function without the backing of a government, would you have to go back to a bartering system? Could you even have a global supply chain in the absence of a stable government? Could people be able to self actualize in an unstable society?
For your "stoner supply chain" did you exchange currency backed by some organization or did you exchange precious metals? How did you and other parties agree on the value of what was exchanged?