656
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago

Easily one of the most evil, destructive figures in the last 20 years of American history. May he get what he deserves.

[-] JonHammCock@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

I've accepted this for so long as baseline knowledge that I've kind of forgotten some of the headlines. Can someone toss me a few bullet points of the bullshittery?

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

I’ll assume you’re not a disingenuous republican. Off the top of my head:

  • Getting in the way of fucking everything Obama tried to do, including passing the ACA.
  • Disgustingly putting his thumb in the eye of everyone who voted for Obama by blocking Merrick Garland’s nomination to the now illegitimate and flagrantly corrupt supreme court (unworthy even of capital letters).
  • Unabashed support for putin’s agent in the white house. Up to and including voting to acquit during the impeachment hearings.

There’s more, but fuck it, I have a show to watch.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The "fun" part of his acquittal vote is that he said he was guilty, but since he had lost the election already, casting a guilty vote would be the wrong thing for the senate to do.

He wanted to both appease trump voters by voting not guilty, and appease saner moderates by calling him guilty in the press.

Just mealy mouthed all the way around.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

He proposed a bill and then when Obama backed it he voted against his own bill.

On another occasion he proposed a bill, and after it passed and the fallout was bad he blamed Obama for not stopping him from passing the bill.

Mostly he's changed the rules to benefit his party at the expense of the American people and / or democracy.

[-] Restaldt@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

He once filibustered his own bill because the democrats called his bluff and wouldve passed the bill

Dont remember what it was

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I once heard him speak about ONE time in ‘97 how a ‘dumuhcrayut’ spoke 3 minutes over their time and he’d held a grudge ever since. That it was his motivation for destroying our system. He’s been a plague for at the very least 24 years but likely his whole career.

Moscow Mitch needs to have retired a long time ago.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
656 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2392 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS