957
submitted 1 year ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

"excluding products where those substances occur naturally."

That seems like a dumb exception. It's not like naturally occurring caffeine is somehow better for you. If it's above that limit, then the law should apply to that as well.

[-] Bigdude1420@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

It's a lot easier to pass a law banning the sale of artificial drinks to minors than it is to ban coffee sales to minors.

[-] uis@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

Artificial drinks, not caffeine? Coffee is artificial drink too because it is human-made.

It nearly impossible to define energy-drinks in a way that does not include coffee, but include off-the-shelf drinks.

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Coffee has its beans dried and roasted, then ground and seeped in water. If you're going to call that artificial, then you are claiming that literally any cooked food is also artificial.

[-] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Coffee has its beans dried and roasted

Coffee beans are dried. Then beans then ungo a Maillard reaction, caramelisation, pyrolysis and decarboxilation to form new organic componds

then ground and seeped in water

Then ground to maximize the surface area. The prouder is then extracted using unpure H2O as solvent. A higher temperature is needed to raise the solubility of the compounds.

[-] noli@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

You can describe anything that's consumed by people with chemical terms and it's gonna sound unnatural.

You remind me of that old joke site warning people of the dangers of the chemical compound DHMO (dihydrogen monoxide)

[-] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah that's basically the point I try to make. You can't even say it's not synthetic since you're synthezise new compounds in the first step. There really is no real difference artificial and natural.

Let's take Vanillin (vanilla flavoring) for example: you could extract it from Vanilla, but it's pretty expensive this way. You could also just synthesize it from wood pulp and get the exact same compound. It's not even just similar, no, it's the exact same.

If something is natural or "artifical" doesn't say anything about how harmful it is.

[-] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I would argue that naturally occurring caffeine is much worse than synthetic caffeine because it also contains rest of plant's toxins and other not so good stuff.

On the other hand not that anyone uses sunthetic caffeine in their drinks. It is expensive as hell.

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
957 points (99.5% liked)

World News

38531 readers
1806 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS