this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
44 points (80.6% liked)
19684
145 readers
277 users here now
Welcome to 19684, please make sure to read the rules:
- You must post before you leave
- No hornyposting
Matrix chat: https://matrix.to/#/#19684:matrix.org
founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If the state doesn't represent the will of the people, then there's no difference between a state and a corporation. Therefore, the USSR had private property. Tankies support private ownership. If they weren't liberals, they'd support the right of the community to take back the means of production from the owning class (AKA the oligarchy)
They at least ostensibly opposed private ownership, whereas for liberals it is a fundamental value and viewed as something desirable. I think it's very dangerous to mix up these terms like this because it might prevent us from seeing the very real threats liberalism presents -- such as its role in enabling fascism.
Tankies also enable fascism. They're the same dangers.
This is still quite distinct from liberalism