this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
692 points (94.0% liked)

politics

31206 readers
2500 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"If the purges [of potential voters], challenges and ballot rejections were random, it wouldn’t matter. It’s anything but random. For example, an audit by the State of Washington found that a Black voter was 400% more likely than a white voter to have their mail-in ballot rejected. Rejection of Black in-person votes, according to a US Civil Rights Commission study in Florida, ran 14.3% or one in seven ballots cast."

"[...] Democracy can win* despite the 2.3% suppression headwind.

And that’s our job as Americans: to end the purges, the vigilante challenges, the ballot rejections and the attitude that this is all somehow OK."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The problem is that Democrats fail to demonstrate that voting for them is better than not voting at all to a large part of the electorate.

That's where the propaganda and foreign influence come in. Their entire effort centered around muddying the waters so people couldn't be sure what the reality was. And voter suppression certainly makes it easier for people to say fuck it.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, there was foreign propaganda, influence, psyops, etc.

Look at Luigi. All of that propaganda failed to contain a very wide, bipartisan swathe of the population who was elated at the CEO's death. Even more moderate people agreed that healthcare sucks even if they don't like people, even murderers, gunned down in the street.

And Democrats still refuse to run on a platform of complete healthcare reform. And before you say "but Republicans would vote it down", make them! Put it forward every week, every session, make a presidential run on it, make overreaching executive orders that fuck with insurance companies, forcing them to sue, every week. Have random low ranking Democrats make speeches about "well Luigi was in the wrong, but such things are inevitable in this system" to get in the papers with controversy. Just like Reps did it with the wall and other stupid stuff. Make it every week's topic who exactly is standing in the way of establishing a proper healthcare system.

And there are other issues like that. Cost of living for example.

Fight, damnit, do something, or you will lose your country.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Do you remember Obamacare and Republicans voting to repeal it literally hundreds of times? Where did that get us?

And now we have less control of the government. We can't even force a vote. The speaker can just refuse to allow it. There is no fight we can win. The best we can hope for is slowing the destruction.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's my point. Instead of the Republicans voting hundreds of times to repeal it, Democrats should have been voting to expand it, anchoring the debate away from Reps. They should have thrown in a massive expansion, and forced a vote around that, again, hundreds of times.

This is not even going low, just fighting.

[–] khornechips@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You’re exactly right. Instead of going on the offense the Dems just think “well this won’t pass so why bother?”

Meanwhile the Republicans are out here writing bills to give Trump a third term. Do you think the fact that it won’t pass matters one iota to them?

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

73 days. That's how long the Dems held the filibuster-proof trifecta that allowed Obamacare in the first place. They haven't had the power to force anything through since. It took everything they could do just to defend what little progress they made. The tactic you are talking about can't work if the other side can just filibuster everything.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

There is no fight we can win. The best we can hope for is slowing the destruction.

This is the attitude whether we give Democrats a majority to squander or not.