this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
36 points (97.4% liked)

Selfhosted

60644 readers
475 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've heard a lot of people say your swap should be 2x RAM.. but do I really need 32GB of swap?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wgs@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Don't even bother with a SWAP partition. Create an empty file on your / partition so you can grow/shrink it as needed.

did if=/dev/zero of=/SWAP bs=1024m count=4
mkswap /SWAP
swapon /SWAP
[–] float@feddit.de 5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

This is the way! There's a catch with swap files on encrypted disks and hibernation but that's quite a special case. Edit: forgot to mention zswap, the compressed version of swap.

[–] mygreatlimbo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Not a golden rule. For example btrfs has limited support for swapfiles.

[–] wgs@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 years ago

Of course there's no golden rule. But I've found this one to be pretty useful ! Didn't know about btrfs limitations though, thanks for the hint!