1928
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GreenMario@lemm.ee 113 points 1 year ago

Sucks but if Lemmy.World is gonna be the "face" of Lemmy it's probably best to keep the shadier sides of the fediverse out. Just to keep the damn lawyer trolls off our back.

Plus it keeps the "uninitiated normies" out of the Piracy instance. At least until they know.

[-] Freeanotherday@hexbear.net 47 points 1 year ago

Don't you all love democracy?

Let's vote on who is the face of the fediverse.

xi-vote

hexbear-retro

[-] Gsus4@feddit.nl 27 points 1 year ago
[-] Freeanotherday@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago

Here's our actual logo.

hexbear-chapochat

My obvious bias aside it is a banger logo.

It comes in lots off different flavors.

hexbear-lesbian hexbear-non-binary hexbear-trans :hexbear-bi-2 hexbear-gay-pride

hexbear-posadist hexbear-pride hexbear sicko-hexbear

[-] CrypticFawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 year ago
[-] imgonnatrythis@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago
[-] Freeanotherday@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

We are socialists... just right click and save them.

marx-hi

[-] Commiejones@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

I think it was a joke and a really good one.

[-] Freeanotherday@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

I knew that.

:side-eye-1:

side-eye-2

[-] randint@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Don't you all love democracy?

This sentence implies that you don't. Why don't you like democracy?

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

it implies that it's not democracy. people just make accounts based on which instance is currently the largest.

[-] DankXiaobong@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

@Freeanotherday@hexbear.net was saying that the "face of lemmy" wasn't voted on, and is surprised, because libs like yourself usually like democracy..

[-] marx_mentat@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago

They will never be the face because they're always down.

[-] GreenMario@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

You ain't wrong lol

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

FWIW this is one of the most frequent communities I see while browsing. I don't mind it but it's definitely a bad look if they want lemmy.world to appeal to the everyman.

I've noticed a lot more "normie" content in the past few weeks so it definitely seems like the site is attracting more than just techy people now.

[-] evranch@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Piracy not appealing to the everyman? With the relentless rise in the cost of living and with streaming services increasing costs and cracking down on password sharing, I don't see many people turning up their nose at piracy these days.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It makes it look like scary hackerman place

[-] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

I'm okay with that, people generally not inclined to pirate must not visit a pirated sub, by choice or by accident. They may get culture shock and mistake perfectly legal conversations for other things and make a false report.

Those who want to pirate generally knows how to search for communities for piracy. No matter who's blocking who, they'll eventually find what they want. The block will act as a filter of some sorts.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

If that keeps the normies out then it's a win.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I put quotes around it to imply I was using the term sarcastically because people who use it in earnest look like elitist douchebags.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, you got me

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Which was always going to happen if Lemmy is to grow. This is fine, decentralisation is what this is made for, so if you want a vanilla experience with only clean sfw content, you can register to instances A B or C, if you fancy some more open internet, then instances X Y or Z might be more for you.

[-] shadowspirit@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I'm fine with the admins using some due diligence. There is some wild s*** out there that no one needs to see terrible and grotesque without warning. The most recent example that I came across was AI generated porn of "jailbait."

Speaking only for myself but if content like that shows up in my feed I will not continue using Lemmy. So I am appreciative of the admins being proactive and if there's something I want to find I'll search for it but the example that I quoted showing up in my feed is absolutely unacceptable to me.

I'm not saying that piracy rises to the level of the quoted example but I don't manage the server and I'm not willing to manage a server so if there are people out there willing to do it to spare me from nefarious things then power to them. They have to do what's right and legal.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why don't you just block the communities yourself?

You have the ability to do that, but instead you're demanding that the instance admins take the choice away from you?

This is some nanny state shit. It's like saying "I don't want to see morally qiestionable things like drag shows, the government should ban them!" Like just block it and don't fucking go there if you don't want to see it. Don't advocate for taking the choice away from everyone.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
1928 points (96.3% liked)

Fediverse

17770 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS