65
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@vlemmy.net to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

โ€œI did not have time to review the Flax Contract and merely wanted to indicate that I did receive his text message.โ€

This is what the ๐Ÿ‘€ emoji is for, is it not? "I am acknowledging seeing this."

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That's not really how ๐Ÿ‘€ is used these days among the young folk, but I wouldn't expect a random Canadian farmer to know that either.

I don't think that a thumbs up emoji should be a valid signature. The farmer was responding to "please confirm flax contract" and the thumbs up emoji really could mean "I've seen your text and will look at the contract to confirm/deny soon." Although the article did also mention that the same type of acceptance had happened previously with this farmer where the contracts were treated as valid and fulfilled so the farmer is probably disingenuous with their argument.

[-] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I would use ๐Ÿ‘€ that way. What else would it be?

[-] valek879@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Surprise and or shock? Wariness? They look like cartoon eyes on like Wile-E-Coyote or Tom when they realize they're still holding the dynamite. ๐Ÿงจ ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐Ÿ˜จ

[-] Vulnicura@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's alluding to being interested.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's more like "look at this shit"/"you seeing this?"/โ€œwhoaโ€ for general stuff. Or sometimes with a slightly inappropriate joke or flirting the eyes acknowledge that and lessen it - like saying jk did back in the day.

In this context if I sent a contract to someone younger and they responded ๐Ÿ‘€ I might have to doublecheck if something was glaringly wrong with it.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

That's interesting. It's wild how emojis are actually the closest thing we have to a universal language, but that language is still new enough that meanings are very fluid and open to interpretation.

[-] Toto@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Judge should have mandated the legally less ambiguous ๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ’ฆ combo to agree to a contract

[-] sergih123@eslemmy.es 3 points 1 year ago

Many times I've gotten the thumbs up as a way to indicate that someone received a message, however it'll only be read later, it can mean that they're doing smt at the moment.

[-] m3adow@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Not according to dictionary.com which the judge referred to for the thumbs up.

They should update the meaning, I also know it as a "read receipt".

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If I was going to read a text and respond to it later, I would just... respond to it later.

Am I out of touch? No, it's the children who are wrong.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

A lot of people hate being "left on read" where they see a programmed read receipt but aren't actually acknowledged. Or for messages without programmed read receipts it does that as well. The thumbs up is also supposed to end conversations quickly.

[-] average650@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's very believable that the farmer would not know the difference.

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
65 points (94.5% liked)

World News

32351 readers
360 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS