1095
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Veteran here. The best healthcare I've gotten is consistently the appointments I have at the VA. Y'know... socialized healthcare. The VA has a reputation for being hot garbage - to my understanding they earned the hell out of that reputation, but made pretty massive improvements relatively recently. I only separated a few years ago, so I never say the earlier version.

...the infrastructure is kinda shit, and riding on those elevators is probably more dangerous than anything I ever did on active duty, but the actual health care? Zero complaints.

They do have wait times, but those are comparable to everywhere else.

We always talk about socialized healthcare like it's some unicorn that only exists in other countries, but we're already doing it... just, for some reason we're only doing it for dipshits like me who wandered into the correct star-spangled employer to trade our lumbar vertebrae for a GI Bill.

Between that and the US Public Health Service (who might actually be unicorns... heard of them, but never actually seen one) we've got the framework for it. I wish we'd just add subdivisions to the USPHS. We already have the VA (which is curiously not affiliated with them... that surprises me), medicare, tricare, Indian Health Service... Start adding bite-sized categories according to need, and offer VA style coverage. Crime Victims Health Service... Students Health Service... Rent-Food-And-Utilities-Eats-60%+-Of-Your-Income Health Service. Just keep expanding the mission and staffing accordingly. Switch VA hospitals to just 'Federal Hospitals' that offer VA services... and medicare... and students... etc. Eventually we'll still be bashing heads about Universal Healthcare when... hey wait a minute! We fuckin have it already! Then just dissolve the stupid labels so you just check in as -a- patient instead of a VA patient. Or not. ...probably not, tbh, the govt fucking loves stupid labels.

...

...I don't actually know why I typed all that out. That was way outside the scope of the comment I'm replying to. Um... I hope you enjoyed my almost-certianly-unrealistic-for-a-thousand-reasons-pipe-dream.

[-] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

There's only one reason why this is a pipe dream: there's no political will to do it.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
1095 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19245 readers
474 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS