Lemdro.id

Last month, MEE reported that a panel of judges appointed by the Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties (ASP), the ICC’s governing body, to review the UN investigation had concluded it had not established any "misconduct or breach of duty" by Khan.

But the chief prosecutor has still not returned to his duties. MEE later reported that a group of disproportionately western and European states voted at a bureau meeting to disregard the panel of judges and make their own assessment, based on the UN report.

In the interview with Hasan, published on Wednesday, Khan said he had thought the judges' conclusion "was the end of the matter. I thought obviously it would be closed straight away". "And I was really perplexed that the bureau didn't close it straight away."

Khan added, "I cooperated with the process, and the process exonerated me. I'm just concerned that…why is it not being closed straight away?"

Pressed on the sexual misconduct allegations against him, Khan said, "I've read the findings of the judges, and in the UN report, there are 137 findings.

The investigation into Khan has unfolded against the backdrop of an intensifying intimidation campaign targeting the prosecutor and the ICC itself over his office's ongoing efforts to bring Gaza war crimes prosecutions against Israeli leaders.

all photographed in a time span of 10 years

By ShepGoesBlep

all photographed in a time span of 10 years😱

Evidence : https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/photographer-marcella-giulia-pace-moon-colors

Last month, MEE reported that a panel of judges appointed by the Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties (ASP), the ICC’s governing body, to review the UN investigation had concluded it had not established any "misconduct or breach of duty" by Khan.

But the chief prosecutor has still not returned to his duties. MEE later reported that a group of disproportionately western and European states voted at a bureau meeting to disregard the panel of judges and make their own assessment, based on the UN report.

In the interview with Hasan, published on Wednesday, Khan said he had thought the judges' conclusion "was the end of the matter. I thought obviously it would be closed straight away". "And I was really perplexed that the bureau didn't close it straight away."

Khan added, "I cooperated with the process, and the process exonerated me. I'm just concerned that…why is it not being closed straight away?"

Pressed on the sexual misconduct allegations against him, Khan said, "I've read the findings of the judges, and in the UN report, there are 137 findings.

The investigation into Khan has unfolded against the backdrop of an intensifying intimidation campaign targeting the prosecutor and the ICC itself over his office's ongoing efforts to bring Gaza war crimes prosecutions against Israeli leaders.

How does it look?

https://sharksandco.com/why-sharks-sometimes-swim-upside-down-1-9479/

A new law will ban retailers from using shoppers' personal data to hike grocery prices—but consumer advocates warn it contains loopholes that companies could exploit.

Can anyone relate?

Imagine doing research with that thing

Been banned for AI-Slop on a few subs here on Lemmy as well as on Reddit.

I always provide a good amount of technical detail in my posts and i try to be as transparant and communicative about the details. My projects are very complicated and I try to document them well.

my project is pretty cryptography-heavy... the act of me sharing my efforts in an attempt to show transparency... but it is used against my project by calling it AI-slop (undermining Kerkhoff's principles).

It's 2026 and most developers are using AI. I have used it to create things like formal proof and verification.

my project is aimed to be a secure messaging app. i have all the bells-and-whistles there along with documentation.... but if the conversation cant move past "its AI-generated"... then it seems the cryptography/cybersecurity/privacy community isnt aligned with the fact that using AI is now common practice for developers of all levels.

AI is a tool. you cant (and shouldnt) "trust" AI to do anything without oversight. AI does not replace the due-diligence that has always been needed. i dont "trust" my hammer to bash in a nail... i "use" the hammer. AI is not different in how you need to be responsible for how its used.

i've busted my ass on my project for it to be called AI slop. i think its completely fine when it comes from folks in the community. cryptography is a serious subject and my ideas and implementation SHOULD/MUST be scrutinised... but its simply ignorant if mods are banning me for the quality of my work considering the the level of transparency and my engagement on discussions about it.

It's a bit reductive to call it slop. I think i try harder than most in providing links, code and documentation. Of course I used AI... and it's clearer for it. (you can find more detail on my profile)

i am of course sour from being banned, but am i wrong to think my code isnt AI slop? Some parts of my project are clearly lazy-ui... but im not sharing on some UI/UX/design sub. the cryptography module has unit tests and formal verification. if that is AI-slop and can result in me being banned, i simply dont have faith in that community to be objective on the reality of where AI can contribute.

while its understandable people dont want to review AI-slop... i think the cryptography/cybersecurity community needs to get on board with the idea of using AI to help in reviewing such code. am i wrong? is the future of cryptography is still people performing manual review of the breathtaking volumes of AI code?

Crossposted from https://lemmy.ca/post/64120740

It only took nine seconds for an AI coding agent gone rogue to delete a company’s entire production database and its backups, according to its founder. PocketOS, which sells software that car rental businesses rely on, descended into chaos after its databases were wiped, the company’s founder Jeremy Crane said.

The culprit was Cursor, an AI agent powered by Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 model, which is one of the AI industry’s flagship models. As more industries embrace AI in an attempt to automate tasks and even replace workers, the chaos at PocketOS is a reminder of what could go wrong.

Crane said customers of PocketOS’s car rental clients were left in a lurch when they arrived to pick up vehicles from businesses that no longer had access to software that managed reservations and vehicle assignments.

https://wandering.shop/@jepyang/116491297085800831

Free her

Artist: Bae.C | pixiv | twitter | patreon | danbooru

Full quality: .webp 2 MB (1000 × 1414)