Lemdro.id

It could be described as the “challenge of the century”.
Energy ministers from some 50 countries are gathering for a two-day summit from April 28-29 in the city of Santa Marta, at the foot of Colombia’s Sierra Nevada mountain range, to address the crucial question of how to move away from fossil fuels – the main drivers of global warming – once and for all.
Organised by Bogota, the summit was prompted by a sobering realisation: when it comes to tackling gas, oil and coal production, the major UN COP meetings are no longer enough. This became clear at the conclusion of COP28 in Dubai in 2023 after a landmark decision to adopt the convention’s final text mentioned the need to begin to “transition away from fossil fuels”.
But negotiations have stalled since then. Consensus has been thwarted with discussions systematically blocked by the major oil and gas-producing countries.
However, the Santa Marta conference may well break the deadlock in climate diplomacy. The question is no longer whether or not fossil fuels should be phased out but rather how the most ambitious countries wrestling with the challenges of climate change can achieve concrete solutions.

It is no coincidence that Colombia is hosting this unprecedented summit. In the small world of oil-producing nations, Gustavo Petro, the country’s first left-wing president, stands out as somewhat of an outsider. Since his inauguration in August 2022, he has consistently criticised the devastating "addiction" to oil that is harming the planet and pledged to transform Colombia, Latin America’s fourth-largest oil exporter, into an economy "free of oil and coal".

[🗃️](https://web.archive.org/web/20260430050207/https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20260429-colombia-hosts-climate-talks-in-bid-to-lead-global-transition-away-from-fossil-fuels

Artist: Kaerunoko | bluesky | pixiv | twitter | tumblr | danbooru

Full quality: .png 2 MB (1447 × 2046)

Buddhist brother says engaging with others in ‘violent’ and ‘bloody’ online game is like playing chess; only worries he may become addicted

Huayan once achieved the Legendary Eagle Master position, a very high ranking in Counter-Strike (CS).

“Why should I quit this good activity? While playing games, I can communicate and cooperate with people to achieve a win-win situation. I also gain empathy for others. These traits are all helpful for a person’s growth,” he said.

A 10-month Commerce Department probe concluded Meta could view all WhatsApp messages in unencrypted form

⛓️‍💥🗃️

Dear selfhosted community,

I have recently setup Wireguard (WG) and I am encountering some weird behaviour, which I assume is due to my lack of understanding. I'll describe my current network setup, the devices i'm using in this setup, the issues that I'm facing, and finally my requirements from the WG installation. This might be slightly wrong but I intend to give as much information as possible.

Network setup

I am attempting to use WG from multiple locations. I am using the wg-easy docker image with OOTB settings.

• Location 0 (L0) = My home where WG is hosted (Internal IP 192.168.30.0/24 and ISP A)
• Location 1 (L1) = Using my android phone hotspot (Internal IP 10.19.79.0/24 using ISP B/mobile data plan)
• Location 2 (L2) = My friend's home (Internal IP 192.168.1.0/24 with ISP C)

Devices & Services

For the sake of this example, I have two devices from which I use WG; an Android phone and a Linux laptop.

I have a couple of self-hosted services at L0 which I access using local DNS entries. So if my devices can connect to my DNS server, I can access my local services (https://jellyfin.server.lan/).

All my WG profiles use full-tunneling, i.e., all traffic is sent to my WG server.

Interesting scenarios

Case 1

When I use WG via L1 (both the phone and my laptop), everything works fine. It always reports ISP A which is correct.

Case 2

When I go to L2, the result is mixed. When I connect to WG from my phone, everything works fine. On my laptop, I can use the internet via WG but I cannot access my local services. I observed that I cannot even ping my devices even though I can use the internet. I verified this by checking ifconfig.io and I could see ISP A.

Case 2B

I tried being a bit creative and manually added a route on my laptop

sudo ip route add 192.168.30.0/24 dev laz-wg

Once I did this, I could ping my devices at L0. But the strange thing is I cannot use my local DNS entries; only direct IP connections were working which indicates my DNS queries were answered by someone else.

Case 3

Another funny observation; if I use my phone at L2 but I use the hotspot facility, i.e., I repeat the signal of my friend's WiFi, and connect my laptop to it AND THEN turn on WG on my laptop, everything works fine (Internet and local DNS entries). I double checked using ifconfig.io and it's reporting ISP A.

Note: I turned off mobile data on my phone before trying the repeater mode, so ISP B is not in the picture in this example.

Case 4 (Repeat of Case 1)

I used another WG profile on my friend's Amazon Firestick (at L2) and I could access my Jellyfin server from it

In summary

1. Laptop @ any location + WG + phone hotspot via ISP B = Working
2. Laptop @ L2 + WG + phone hotspot via ISP C = Working
3. Phone @ L2 + WG via ISP C = Working
4. Laptop @ L2 + WG via ISP C = Only internet working, services at L0 not working

So what do I want?

First of all, why this discrepancy between Android and Linux?

I want a WG setup where if I share a WG profile with anyone, I expect

1. The user does not have to tinker with the setup
2. Local DNS entries should work OOTB
3. Should work the same on Windows/Android/Linux

I am prepared to configure everything server side but with minimal change on the client-side. So what is wrong and what should I do to fix it?

https://wandering.shop/@jepyang/116491297085800831

Artist: Superpig | bluesky | pixiv | twitter | danbooru

Full quality: .png 2 MB (1200 × 1792)