Wireless devices being vulnerable? I am shocked. SHOCKED!
userentity
joined 1 month ago
Deshalb gleich noch beibringen, dass der Sicherheitsgurt schmarrn ist.
night driving is finally bearable
the game has a verify files and cleanup tool, would recommend using that. i had some performance issues after updating the last few times as well, and these fixed it for me every time. could also be mods though
That's why you couple it with your own, self-hosted yacy or searxng instance. Embedded world knowledge does not help a model if it becomes outdated. I just let my agent research, embed that knowledge to a little Qdrant server, so other servers are not bothered again and pull the information from there when needed again. With a little RAG you can have GPT at home.
I had to get mine from ebay and wait a couple weeks as they came from China too. Also I recommend having a 3D-Printer and some Blower-Fans on hand as you will either have to buy or print your own fan shroud for these server cards.
A P40 with 24GB is ~150€, a V100 (32GB) is ~600€. Both of these fit Qwen3.6 27B (The P40 is about 3x slower though). The V100 even fits 400k context with a Q4 KV-Cache , which means you can have two slots for parallel processing (llama-cpp). You don't even have to use system memory. One of my inference servers is running with 8gb of DDR3 and a 2nd Gen i7, so my old hardware as a good use again.
aw man blobs in oss? why is there no scanner for that?
Calling a "blacklists.rs" in directly in the top level rust source tree hidden is an overstatement. The blacklist is not obfuscated or compressed. It is just a blacklist.
Qwen 3.6 27B MTP (Q4) is really great. ~24GB VRAM usage with one slot @ 262k . ~30GB with 3 slots at 128k. Also it does not struggle like Gemma if you use e.g. a Q4 KV-Cache. And it runs at 400-800 ppt/s and 20-60 itp/s on a V100.
But it has a competitor since a short while that is Laguna XS 2.1, which is really good for a A3B MoE. I'd never have thought a 30B MoE could be on par with a 27B dense, but it seemingly is.
view more: next ›
depending on the task and output quality, the human will not be automated away. why do we still have assembly line jobs? a human must always be in the loop. if they get fired (or most likely the contract runs out) it was a temporary job anyways. in most european countries they also can not just lower your wages.
i do not see an issue if i can tell an agent to implement features that i can then review and test. it somewhat shifts how work is done, but that is it. also the take "employing anyone to instruct ai instead of a specialist" does not make sense. you still need deep knowledge in a domain to plan out and review, that is not something one can outsource to anyone.