the_swagmaster

joined 5 months ago
[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Not sure what market your in but in Europe the price gap is not that huge, 30% max far as I can tell. Obviously that's still quite a bit when we are talking about car money but 20 vs 60 as you mention is not realistic as long as your not comparing the byd dolfin to a Mercedes.

I also never mentioned Chinese cars are poor quality. Actually they seem like quite good quality and as others have said their software seems good too though I've never driven one so I don't know. The current automakers, whilst they have the build quality sorted, the software and a few is lacking

One suggestion no one seems to suggest is to buy a second hand car. Imo, you get much more value for your money and since the car is already made you help the environment out too by not consuming something that needed to be made just for you

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aquire, own, however you want to describe gaining a car in this alternative system. The point is, getting a product that is able to be acquired for an unfair price due to the CCP propping up and protecting their own companies would still be unfair.

I agree with your want for having everyone be more cooperative. The Chinese started by being quite cooperative in building cars with western companies. I used to think that was good but now that CCP has turned it around and doesn't want to share any of their developed tech with other players, I think western business greed got the better of us. I'm not as pesemistic as others that the west is very far behind. European brands do make some killer electric cars but they may not have quite the range or quite the low price and they have not been on the market for that long.

Finally, I'm not trying to make bad faith arguments. I just disagree with your position that I'll buy a dumped Chinese car because fuck the current players for not innovating. That is how I understand your position anyway, if that's not right please explain the neuance I'm missing rather than attacking me

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (7 children)

So your solution is change the whole system so you can buy a dumped Chinese car without any guilt?

Whilst I agree the system is broken, buying dumped goods only makes the situation worse as it means those players and playing on an uneven playing field

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not again... unzips

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

True, my doctor suggested this but sometimes I like to switch it up to surprise my partner.

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Only put the one you plan to use

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Disregarding the idea of base load is crazy. Sure, wind and solar can provide enough energy but their supply is still not as consistent and a powerplant. We also don't have battery technology good enough to store the exces and release it when needed. We saw in spain that if your power system is too reliant on wind/solar and there is a sudden change in the supply/demand that it can cause the system to fuck up. We need base load it fill in those gaps of low supply.

Of course there are alternatives. Pumped storage is the most reliable energy storage system. Could use geothermal too. But both require the geography. Nuclear just needs a big body of water which the UK has.

Another thing to consider is the security risks offshore wind/solar have. The Russians could decide to cut the power cables leading from a big wind farm and that could fuck up the power system until it's fixed. If we had base load in the form of nuclear then the impact such an attach could have may be minimise.

Is nuclear perfect, fuck no. But the technology is well understood and until hydrogen or nuclear fusion are realised, we can be building something that can replace fossil fuel base load

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed, we need to replace any fossil fuel baseload we currently have with something and nuclear is a good (though not perfect) option

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Sure, we could buy lots of solar and wind but we need to diversify our energy supply. If we only had wind and solar and one day all of a sudden there happens to be not enough wind and solar that could cause huge energy instability. Or, what if the Russians cut a cable that brings energy from a large offshore wind/solar farm leading to power uncertainty in the country.

Obviously those scenarios are unlikely but that doesn't mean they can't happen. Having solid, reliable energy is one of the most important things a country needs to be prosperous. Is nuclear perfect? Fuck no, but it's way better than coal, LNG, or any other fossil fuel energy source that we currently use. I believe having more nuclear power stations to provide a solid fallback option is always beneficial even if they are expensive and are imperfect

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t understand half the stuff they say but sounds like they’ve managed to sort one problem. Now just need to get the fusion process itself to be viable and then maybe anll our energy needs will be sorted?

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Half-life 3 launch trailer! /s

Jk, in reality I'd love to see more about the new bond game. Was hoping they'd show more after they showed off the first trailer.

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed, I'm more cautiously optimistic (cause you never know how it'll go) but IO do have a good track record. Hopefully they give themselves time to cook and make it excellent!

 

The video illustrates the current issues with the EU and why it is unable to be strong for its member states. NOTE: the video is sponsored by Union of European Federalists

view more: next ›