[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 73 points 2 months ago

rtfm and other toxicity in the gnu/linux community are a microsoft psyop change my mind

373
gaea rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
106
rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 2 months ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
108
submitted 2 months ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

STOP USING QUEER CULTURE FOR POLITICAL CLOUT STOP USING QUEER CULTURE FOR POLITICAL CLOUT STOP USING QUEER CULTURE FOR POLITICAL CLOUT STOP USING QUEER CULTURE FOR POLITICAL CLOUT STOP USING QUEER CULTURE FOR POLITICAL CLOUT STOP USING QUEER CULTURE FOR POLITICAL CLOUT context

231
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Important context: This was an instance of a crowd crush caused by poor crowd control.

edit: action has now been taken against the offending comment :)

(also some of you guys in the comments here have been yoinked by mods too… just be nice? this post was not an invitation to test out your boundaries)

by opening this spoiler you acknowledge that brigading and harrassment are against the ruleslink to post in question: https://lemmy.world/comment/10965360

35
submitted 2 months ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

This is inspired by this advice from a few months ago:

Stop giving shitty mods a free pass. Honest mistakes happen; but if the mod in question is assumptive, disingenuous, trigger-happy, or eager to enable certain shitty types of user, spread the word about their comm being poorly moderated. And don’t interact directly with the comm. I think that at least here in the Fediverse we should demand higher standards from our mods.

(Emphasis mine.)

In the past I have used places like !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world or !196@lemmy.blahaj.zone to call out mods on other subs, with mid-to-almost-high degrees of success, but I wonder if it would be better to have a dedicated sublemmy?

Here are my thoughts on what would make this effective:

  • probably shouldn’t be hosted on .world due to the breadth of possible conflicts of interest with admins
  • probably shouldn’t be hosted on .ml due to federation hurdles
  • mods of the community shouldn’t moderate any other communities of any significant size, in order to make the whole “accountability” thing work
  • mods should be willing and able to deal with substantial quantities of garbage posts because there would be a lot of “why won’t c/xyz let me be transphobic/say slurs 😡😡” type submissions which, left unaddressed, would outflood genuine criticism

This is still in conceptual form so I am interested what others think :)

152
No Competition (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 2 months ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
209
submitted 2 months ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
133
small penis rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
34
what’s up vro (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 2 months ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
83
my fault gang (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 2 months ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
219
sir rule sir 🙂 (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
-17

will prob delete. Prob offensive

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 77 points 3 months ago

really fair, it’s certainly an uncommon skill but it’s definitely a skill we should be able to expect of our literal leaders

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 77 points 4 months ago

This is exactly why I try to engage with the apparent trolls sometimes. 95% of the time your reading is right and you disengage shortly after but one in twenty times there’s just a confused person on the other end that needs a little helping hand 🥹❤️

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 69 points 4 months ago

Yeah man, thanks for sharing your story, genuinely very poignant.

But at this point I genuinely don’t care about the bear thing. Women were harrased into leaving the platform, nothing was done to the accounts who did it, and that’s the story here.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 75 points 6 months ago

this PDF will probably be referenced in the “genocide denial” article in the not-too-distant future

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 71 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

this is an unpopular opinion but i know the aesthetic reason for apple not implementing this for so long, and like eveything, it’s to make money.

android design is pretty good, but user created android phones home screens can often look pretty hateful, often with 4-6 screens of more empty space than icons, tons of widgets with an inconsistent design scheme, random half empty folders and a notification bar overcrowded with overshrunk icons. android phones often look like old Windows XP desktops—even on flagship distributions.

in contrast to google, apple cares what your phone looks like because they have a highly visual brand.

apple, by not allowing placement anywhere intentionally enforced a consistent top-left to bottom-right aesthetic which is now ubiquitous to the brand. among other design decisions, the result is that when you blur your eyes and look at a phone home screen you can tell whether it is apple or not.

  • but the functionality is worse, yes i know.
  • but it actually does look worse too, to you maybe, but not to apple. my belief is they did this for the same reason they put the magic mouse’s lighting port on the bottom (to keep users from always using it plugged in. which looks “ugly”).

the power of a strong and unmistakable brand is incomparable. in many cases, the value of a brand can even outperform raw product utility when it comes to customer satisfaction, a theory which i believe apple has been leveraging in this case very much intentionally despite the seeming paradox of utility.

edit: already getting downvoted to heck i should have known better than to be aware of basic marketing principles lol. i promise you im not defending apple im just explaining why they did this to make more money.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 69 points 6 months ago

wow cant believe my republican conservative tradtional values heterosexual free market band has gone woke, this one really hurts

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 68 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

tineye reverse image search

0 results

im afraid

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 75 points 6 months ago

ooh hot take. reasearchers should stop doing security testing for OpenAI for free. aren’t they just publishing these papers, with full details on how it might be fixed, with no compensation for that labor?

bogus. this should work more like pen testing or finding zero day exploits. make these capitalist “oPeN” losers pay to secure the shit they create.

(pls tell me why im wrong if i am instead of downvoting, just spitballing here)

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 73 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

internet users will see high density housing that allows for more community and green space than their suburban homes and call it ugly

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 69 points 7 months ago

while i agree with calling out google to do better, im really scared by the vehemence of these comments.

anyway please note that the domestic violence hotline is here and available for all genders. ❤️

view more: ‹ prev next ›

spujb

joined 9 months ago