[-] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 76 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Source? This is cropped exactly so that you don't see what the first guy/gal is responding to. Mighty sus

Who is attacking libraries and where? Did the first person just make that up? IDK

[-] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

I'll just use Firefox mobile with uBlock Origin then, literally anything is better than ads

[-] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago

Why is a smaller version of the picture superimposed onto a larger, blurry version?

[-] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 71 points 10 months ago

That's a bit different, as in magnitudes more stupid (if true)

[-] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

I blame all three + the driver again for buying this stupid fucking truck they probably don't even need and won't benefit them 99% time. But hey, it excels at killing children in driveways, so that's something.

177
[-] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

This is a way for shitty writers to justify infodumping in their story. If your main character doesn't know shit about the world he just got put into, you can justify every other character dumping a huge load of setting and world building down his ear canal. Instead of, like, trying to mix that info naturally into the story, which also avoids the "as you know, John..." trope (where character A explains something to character B that they already should know), but requires effort and skill on the part of the author.

[-] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

You could present those guys with a supermodel or the fucking platonic ideal of a woman and they would go "that's 7.1 at most, stop overrating"

15
Hmmm... 🤔 (lemmy.world)
[-] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 139 points 1 year ago

did they expect to get their name in credits for doing their job?

Yes, that is the purpose of the credits. To credit people who did their job on the project.

[-] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

when you’ve never held an actual floppy disk

This makes me feel old and I'm only in my mid twenties

[-] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

That’s way harder than other systems, where the government already owns all the homes, and can simply drive up the cost whenever they want :/

When was the last time you voted for your landlord?

[-] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 137 points 1 year ago

Almost everyone

13

Two days ago I was cycling along a rural road; slightly before an intersection (a road to the left, like this: -|) a guy behind me started to pass me on the left lane and a woman on the intersecting road tried turning right.

After he passed me, in what seemed like a few seconds I realized that they would surely crash - the woman wasn't looking in front of her (looking to the left to see if she can enter), and the guy wouldn't be able to go to the right lane in time. And so they did. A frontal crash, but no major injuries as far as I could see (they both walked out of their cars).

What's interesting about this is that both are at fault: the woman should not just check her left, but also look where she's driving. The guy shouldn't have tried to pass me before an intersection - that's illegal. But both made those simple mistakes and it resulted in major damage to their vehicles and endangered their lives. But as tempting as it would be to call them bad drivers and move on, this made me think a bit about safety and cars.

Is it really a good idea for so many people to be driving, from a basic safety standpoint? We require people to have a certain skillset to operate heavy machinery and exhaustive training in every other instance except for cars - where standards are so low even your average Joe Blow can pass the test. And this is in Europe, btw. Cars are just fundamentally unsafe for a general user. The deaths from car crashes are treated as an inevitable reality, when in other modes of transportation things were done to make them safer and it worked, similar things happened in many industries with industrial machinery. Only with cars do we accept this lack of safety and shitty outcomes.

The problem is we give a heavy, fast piece of machinery to people who are a wide cross-section of society and may be unqualified, or at times tired or distracted, and make mistakes. This can happen even to professionals, but if there were far less cars on the roads, the potential consequences of those mistakes would be far less severe. It takes small moments of distraction for a tragedy to happen, and it would be difficult to expect from people as a group to never make mistakes - but this isn't accounted for when crafting traffic laws. Those don't seem to effectively stop people from making mistakes, they just infrequently penalize them.

5
Hemorrhoids (lemmy.world)
23
Hemorrhoids (lemmy.world)
2
1
view more: next ›

kartonrealista

joined 1 year ago