I really hope the developers weren't thinking about this pun while developing the plot...

"The report states that witnesses inside the house saw Williams pour gasoline from a soda bottle onto clothes and the floor of the laundry room. Williams then lit Takis tortilla chips on fire and tossed them into the laundry room."

"The report states that witnesses inside the house saw Williams pour gasoline from a soda bottle onto clothes and the floor of the laundry room. Williams then lit Takis tortilla chips on fire and tossed them into the laundry room."

Following a Lemmy community from an ActivityPub microblogging server such as Mastodon, Pleroma, or Misskey, sets the server to repost all messages sent to the community (whether original threads or their replies) as separate posts. However, both the threads and the replies to these have their ActivityPub privacy set to "public", instead of "unlisted". This means that on the home page, if you follow a Lemmy community, it will not only display the thread but also each individual reply in reverse chronological order. This generally pollutes the home page with more messages than required. While the main posts should remain with privacy set to "public", replies should be set to "unlisted" instead.

cross-post from https://www.reddit.com/r/wholesomememes/comments/154egtb/betty_anne_waters_a_high_school_drop_out_became_a/

When attempting to vote on any posts, my self-hosted site is unable to store the vote. Checking on the logs I get an error message that states there is no unique or exclusion constraint matching the ON CONFLICT specification. This points towards a problem with the database, but I'm not sure if it can be solved by rebuilding some index, or by fixing the upstream handling of duplicate data.

I'm getting a constant barrage of errors similar to the one below:

WARN Error encountered while processing the incoming HTTP request: lemmy_server::root_span_builder: there is no unique or exclusion constraint matching the ON CONFLICT specification
   0: lemmy_apub::activities::voting::vote_post
             at crates/apub/src/activities/voting/mod.rs:126
   1: lemmy_apub::activities::voting::vote::receive
             at crates/apub/src/activities/voting/vote.rs:71
   2: lemmy_apub::activities::community::announce::receive
             at crates/apub/src/activities/community/announce.rs:141
   3: lemmy_server::root_span_builder::HTTP request
           with http.method=POST http.scheme="http" http.host=communities.azkware.net http.target=/inbox otel.kind="server" request_id=7e024b6a-3e4c-47b6-984d-0e2f04a52602 http.status_code=400 otel.status_code="OK"
             at src/root_span_builder.rs:16

I originally posted it here

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1433287

The trend has reportedly sparked a backlash from some in China due to safety reasons. Read more at straitstimes.com.

!costarica@kbin.fedi.cr

Follow from Lemmy

Follow from Kbin

Personally, my favorite is the gyro on button hold, bound to the aiming button, as Breath of the Wild originally did. I'm personally peeved about the always-on implementation on Splatoon though, because any slight tremor in your hand means your aim will suffer. (At least they had the decency of adding a dedicated recenter button.) And how do you go three games in a row not allowing the players to correct the vertical aim with the stick? What in the world is the rationale for that?