Juice

I'm calling bullshit

There are a bunch of pics of 600-800 lb pigs that have been hunted and they are like 1/4 the size of this

Is this real? How the fuck did anyone lift this into the truck without a fucking crane?

Anarchist Literature

The Great French Revolution by Kropotkin was a favorite of Lenin. I'm also very partial to the works of Malatesta, the Italian Anarchist.

Wasn't this intentional? The first thing he did was halve the value of the currency. Seems kinda goofy to dunk on someone for accomplishing what he set out to accomplish

This tool is a professor at Harvard, who get his essays published in Time, while you're out here acting like you're not good enough.

I'm great at navigating all of these other inter personal/political dynamics except when we have to actually work together on the basis of politics. My experience of doing political work with other volunteers doing political work has been like working through the 5 stages of grief, where when I reach "acceptance," I'm basically like "fuck this, it isn't worth sacrificing my mental health" except this road of self improvement and political/historical education that I've been on for like 12 years leads to this. I feel very lost even though I'm exactly where I've intended to go

Okay so there's some differences between what I'm talking about and what you are talking about. Everything you are saying is reflective of my experience as well, except I'd drill down more on your last paragraph or two.

Like you make good points that I agree with wrt dealing with people who you have nothing in common with concerning their individual political opinions. With this much difference, especially concerning what you said about dating someone with drastically different politics, the politics indicate deeper held values that made you romantically or socially incompatible. That is Fairly normal and unsurprising, and my experience is largely similar.

But what if you're in an org that actually has somewhat strict rules about who can join: what political opinions they have, and what priorities they fight for? What if you agree with 95% of what an org participates in, but you see that they are wrong about 5%? And that is creating bad reads of current events, etc? Like for example, you join a group of explicitly Marxist communists, but they just aren't that great about colonialism and decolonial struggles, despite being well read, well connected, relevant, and offer tons of amazing resources to its members. The people who have been dedicating their personal time and energy and money to educating you and trying to grow the org are now wrong about something crucial to the orgs ability to take on impactful work. A group within the org develops a critique that addresses the problems, and you find yourself aligning with them, but this puts you at odds with others who are struggling against those criticisms, people who you personally care about but seem to be somewhat hurt by your support of the critique?

Or you find yourself a leader of a few local working groups in a large national org, but other leaders, whose politics you find acceptable, due to their affiliation with factions that don't like whatever faction you belong to, like not even actively vindictively opposing you, tend to go out of their way to distinguish themselves from you, at any conspicuous opportunity. They don't like Marxism, or they think that "communism" is a synonym for "authoritarian", or they are just kinda opportunist cuz they are young and not as well established. But yet they are in charge of work that you know is important and you need to participate in.

Even working in cadre is exhausting when I learn that someone I work with who I really admire and helped to get me established is like really into UFOs and alien conspiracy theories. Other than that you agree on everything else, but yet every once in a while discussions veer into this positively absurd territory.

And all of these are real examples from my perspective. If I imagine how I must seem to the other people referenced here, my actions become just as exhausting and frustrating.

In my experience a lot of leftists agree that everything is political, but then don't really participate in politics outside of individual political opinions. There is a realm of the expressly political that exists not apart from but still distinguishable from the realm of the "everything is politics." If you wanna say that is a bastardization that's fine but what's the alternative??

Yeah, the 1850s

Okay so don't take this in any way than me just relating my personal experience, but while I agree with what you are saying from the position of someone who sees the depoliticization of the working class as disastrous and idealistic, and who does organizing in their community with other commies and socialists, I can't stand politics. I organize with people who are good at it, and several people who like it and went to school for it; but while I can "play the game" as a matter of pure necessity, it is such a source of burn out and negativity. And I honestly don't know what to do about it anymore, because powering through it has stopped working

Is that what "this estimation assumes other factors associated with earning potential — for instance, gender, age, years of schooling, and location — are held equal," means? Cuz that's not what it sounds like. Assuming things are equal isn't this statistical matching thing you are talking about

Edit: I found the study so I'm trying to figure out how these other factors are controlled for.

I don't get how making sexual difference equal does anything other than make sexual difference disappear. When half the population is shorter because of sexual difference, and also paid less due to structural discrimination on the basis of gender/sex, making those differences equal makes the actual causes disappear. I just don't get it. I have no background in labs or experimentation so sorry if I'm being dense.

Marx flattens some differences in order to illustrate class distinctions and disappear certain confusing elements before working them in later, but he explains why and how, and what effect this will have.

But how would you do this with sex, when the thing you are measuring, height and pay, are both directly related, either physiologically or socially? I couldn't find the link to the study or more info, and the fact this is in Forbes makes my register a beep