355
submitted 4 months ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world

A previously unknown focus of an I.R.S. audit is a dubious accounting maneuver that effectively meant taking the same write-offs twice on a Chicago skyscraper.

Archive link.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 56 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is my favorite bit.

With sales lagging far behind projections, he claimed that his investment in the condo-hotel tower met the tax code definition of “worthless,” because his debt on the project meant he would never see a profit.

It’s got his name all over it.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago

Oh please, this is just more fake news by the lying liberal media designed to make a demented rapist and convicted fraud seem like some sort of dishonest person. Woke!

[-] LilDumpy@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

The first write-off came on Mr. Trump’s tax return for 2008. With sales lagging far behind projections, he claimed that his investment in the condo-hotel tower met the tax code definition of “worthless,” because his debt on the project meant he would never see a profit. That move resulted in Mr. Trump reporting losses as high as $651 million for the year, The Times and ProPublica found. There is no indication the I.R.S. challenged that initial claim, though that lack of scrutiny surprised tax experts consulted for this article. But in 2010, Mr. Trump and his tax advisers sought to extract further benefits from the Chicago project, executing a maneuver that would draw years of inquiry from the I.R.S. First, he shifted the company that owned the tower into a new partnership. Because he controlled both companies, it was like moving coins from one pocket to another. Then he used the shift as justification to declare $168 million in additional losses over the next decade.

[-] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago
[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 13 points 4 months ago

If intentional, as it would seem to be, shouldn't there be jail time too. Or is that inky for people that steal less than a million?

[-] sxan@midwest.social 12 points 4 months ago

Eh. His base will cough it up for him. And then he'll get it reduced by half during appeal, and pocket the difference.

Right now, it's his most profitable business venture.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

grifting his base is probably his only profitable business venture at the moment.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] dellish@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

JFC indeed! That questionnaire was vomit-worthy, and the ticker at the bottom showing "recent donations" needs work because they're repeating the same fake names over and over.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah, it’s gross alright. Did you notice that there’s no way to submit your answers of the multiple choice questions without donation? It baits people to show their conviction to their responses with payment. Despicable.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

"Fake news, folks! There are two Trump Towers in Chicago! The Biden crime family doesn't want you to see the second tower, folks. But it's there. It's there. Two, big, beautiful towers in downtown Chicago!"

[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago
[-] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

As a Chicagoan, I can't wait for the day we pull that god awful name off that building like a Saddam Hussein statue.

this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
355 points (97.6% liked)

News

22956 readers
3675 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS