740

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Ahem.

Landlords should have their rental properties seized and placed under the ownership of the local government. Berlin did it. You want to bring housing prices back into reach of the middle class? Stop letting people hoard houses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Incubus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Copernican@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Although I love the gothamiat. I think they should pay taxes. But what does this have to do with personal finance?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
740 points (88.5% liked)

Personal Finance

3824 readers
2 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS