378
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 86 points 10 months ago
  1. Force women to give birth against their will
  2. Deny them any public support

Seems like they're intentionally maximizing the suffering of women and children.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 35 points 10 months ago

Yes, that's been their platform for decades. The cruelty is the point

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They don’t actually give a fuck about cruelty imo because they don’t see worker drones as people. Ensuring the working class is on the edge of crisis is the point. They want people to be hardly making it, but enough to keep going, so they’ll work endlessly and accept crappy conditions. They want people to be deluded by propaganda and not have the energy or time to seek political change. Making money and retaining power is the point.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's the viewpoint of the elites running the party. For the average rube, they want to see the "right people" suffer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

That's because you're thinking about it wrong. Here try this: say "Jesus!" Good- now wave your hands way above your head like you're waving to a cloud with both hands.

There ya go. See? It all makes perfect, rational, logical sense. vote Trump. Then shut up.

Next!

[-] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Isn't society miserable? It's because you don't work hard enough. Also government doesn't work. Can't you see how we didn't send you food? It's the government's fault so we need to get rid of the government. Both sides! But first vote for us so we can remove the government regulations that are stopping us from destroying the government

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago

Also it's a trans kid's fault.

[-] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

THE trans kid.

Started a weird group about eggs with a bunch of normal kids

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

The next step is to turn both thumbs down and frown while saying socialism.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 10 months ago

The 15 states that did not apply are Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont and Wyoming.

Fuck paywalls.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 47 points 10 months ago

Also, fuck those governors.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 10 months ago

I live in South Dakota. Kristi Noem is an absolute ghoul.

[-] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

My understanding is that she’s on the shortlist to be Trump’s running-mate.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 10 months ago

Doesn't surprise me.

She's so awful that she's literally blacklisted from setting foot on the Pine Ridge Reservation.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 8 points 10 months ago

I live in Texas, where our governor recently pined for shooting migrants at the border. I feel you.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

Yep. I actually have a discord buddy in Texas, and we talk about these things a lot. I empathize.

[-] Efwis@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately I’m in Texas too. Can’t wait to get the hell outta here, probably close to a year and a half and we can leave, wife wants to wait til youngest is 18 and on his own.

Hope we live that long. Stay warm.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Kristi Noem is an absolute ghoul.

Isn't she the "good Christian wife" (of someone else) who spent years secretly knocking boots with that asshole from the Trump campaign, Corey Lewandowski (also married to someone else)?

She's also apparently a mother of three, which is hilarious in its own way because Republican school book bans are such that her kids could know all about Mommy's Special Friend from the news and possibly her own behavior, but they would be irreparably harmed by reading a library book about it and that must NEVER happen.

[-] Jaderick@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Vermont??

Oh they elected trash as a governor. Mind blown.

[-] aew360@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

So weird how Vermont has a Republican governor and Kansas and Kentucky have Democrat ones.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Especially since Vermont is one of the most liberal and progressive states in the entire country.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Surprised my state (TN) isn’t on the list. Our government is almost as shitty as Florida’s.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

imagine being so partisan you're willing to throw all the children in your state under the bus.

Aren't most of those states allowing child labor as well?

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

How else do you convince children to work for low wages if they're well-fed and happy?!

[-] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

For these guys...the cruelty is the point

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

You can they really care... about making life harder for people.

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 10 months ago

“We anticipate that our state’s full approach to serving children will continue to be successful this year without any additional federal programs that inherently always come with some federal strings attached.”

Like what?

[-] ElleChaise@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Like when they put interstates through the Southern United States, then had to actually force Florida to enforce drunk driving rules, threatening to take away highway funding iirc. Just one of the million examples I can remember being controversial briefly. I wanna say there was a similar debacle surrounding seat belts. Basically any time the Fed gives you money, it comes with some (albeit basic, somewhat common sense) rules and stipulations.

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 10 months ago

"You must turn off the orphan crushing machine to receive food aid for children."

GOP, "No, we like our orphan crushing machine."

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

I haven't heard of that before. Was that part of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 or some other bill?

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

The federal government routinely ties highway funds to conditions like that - they did it with drinking age, as well as BAC percentage for drunk driving laws.

One example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Minimum_Drinking_Age_Act

The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 was [… ] signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on July 17, 1984. The act would punish any state that allowed persons under 21 years to purchase alcoholic beverages by reducing its annual federal highway apportionment by 10 percent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Maybe they are required to follow educational guidelines that might hamper their book, CRT, black history, LGBTQ+, etc., banning efforts.

[-] Introversion@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Like feeding kids, duh.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 15 points 10 months ago

the party that wants to put god back in schools also wants them to starve while they worship

[-] ApostleO@startrek.website 15 points 10 months ago

If God wanted those kids fed, he'd have rained mana from the heavens, or multiplied bread and fish for them. If they are hungry, they clearly deserve it.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

The kids deserve it for being poor and not pulling themselves up by their bootstraps and starting a small business.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

The party of "family values" and "pro-life".

[-] VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

There's a Venn diagram somewhere of the states denying food aid for children and states rolling back child labor protections. From the linked article "State child labor law changes are part of a broader, troubling agenda to boost corporate profits and increase economic desperation of low-income families and children" and "While FGA lobbies for the erosion of child labor protections in states like Arkansas, Iowa, and Missouri, they are simultaneously working to limit access to anti-poverty programs like SNAP and Medicaid, block expansion of Medicaid eligibility, and promote the defunding of public education through expansion of school vouchers in the same states. Taken together, FGA’s priorities represent a radical, multilayered assault on the same low-income families whose economically desperate children are most vulnerable to recruitment by unscrupulous employers for jobs involving long hours, low wages, and hazardous conditions that harm their education, health, and well-being."

So literally the plan is: Make em super hungry, exploit them for cheap labor while they're young, tell em anyone who's still hungry is a lazy leach who deserves to starve.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

"Think of the children...when it's time for 'cost savings'." -- G.O.P.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

“The children matter! Let’s change that”

-GOP

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

"Imagine a world of endless pregnancies and births, but no surviving children!" -GOP

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OmenAtom@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

That banana is fucking massive

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


More than eight million children in 15 states, all led by Republican governors, will be shut out of a new federal food assistance program intended to help needy families during the summer months.

Set to begin this summer, the new program will provide low-income families with $120 for each eligible child, which can be used to purchase food at grocery stores, farmers’ markets or other approved retailers when such assistance is not available in schools.

Asked why Florida did not apply for the summer food program, the state’s Department of Children and Families wrote in an email to The Orlando Sentinel last month: “We anticipate that our state’s full approach to serving children will continue to be successful this year without any additional federal programs that inherently always come with some federal strings attached.”

But he said he was heartened by the willingness of the state’s tribal nations — the Cherokee, Chickasaw and Osage — to offer the program to eligible Native and non-Native children on their reservations.

Missouri, for instance, wrote in a letter to the Agriculture Department in December that a “lack of final guidance” and the uncertainty of securing state funding posed “potential unforeseen challenges.”

Still, Caitlin Whaley, communications director for the Missouri Department of Social Services, explained: “Philosophically, we support the premise that kids should be fed in the summer, and this is an additional resource to that end.


The original article contains 771 words, the summary contains 233 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

We should be sending more kids into dirty chimneys.

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Seeing Vermont on the list and their rationale of it being very difficult to meet the legislative requirements to fulfill this makes me question criticism of not signing up.

I do see some of the rationales being bullshit for many states but it doesn't seem trivial to take advantage of this aid money from an organizational perspective.

[-] Introversion@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Capitalism Jesus is proud. Fuck those lazy kids wanting handouts! Are there no workhouses?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
378 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2295 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS