this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
319 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

85272 readers
4351 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WPSteam@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

And it'll increase further in the near future... Only for background play and Advert removal, 16/month is absurd considering they don't have any content licensing headache and as such unlike Netflix, Disney + etc. Also, in case of YT Music, royalties paid out to artists are pretty opaque and pretty turbulent. Better to buy albums directly to support them. Brave FTW otherwise for YouTube

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

This is still in the phase where its a really good deal. The reason i'll never buy it is because I know it will not always be that way.

[–] corey931@lemmy.wtf 11 points 1 day ago

If you actually want to support artists, don’t. YouTube Music’s royalty payout is far from stable and transparent, not to mention low to others which is already hard to beat really. Tidal comes closest (from what I found to having functionality and paying artists a more fair rate. Qobuz is there too, Deezer pioneers detecting AI garbage that people think makes them artists now. Spotify got most features ofc but they’re unethical as shit

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The more they charge, the fewer will pay.

load more comments (4 replies)

We get it for $6.5 lol cuz we from poor region

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Youtube what? Ohhh, that annoying popup I always decline. Apparently the price only matters if you buy it.

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only time I ever subscribed was when I could pay in Argentina. Came out to like $3.50 per month. Once they patched that loophole, they stopped getting my money.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, they're worth maybe $5 a month or family. It's just a bunch of B-F rate videos and they pay anyone that's not in the B tier so little than you need to support them on patreon anyway.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 82 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Good. Enshittify some more so more people will be driven towards adblocking frontends such as NewPipe and FreeTube. Eat big tech's bandwidth, but starve them of any revenue.

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Grayjay too.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Newpipe is free. You can donate to support if you'd like. No account required, so no tracking. Subs and history are stored locally. And with an internet condom (VPN) no IP exposure.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 1 points 15 hours ago

PipePipe = NewPipe + SponsorBlock.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Who in their right mind actually pays for YouTube?

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
  1. I have kids and having them subjected to ads is a burden on them AND on me. I don't get begged for the latest toys, or have to watch the latest ad for whatever cream will solve my latest rash...
  2. I don't mind supporting channels that I watch. I also pay for PBS as I want to support that type of programming.
  3. I spend enough time supporting all the IT needs and maintaining my existing household's IT infrastructure for players for all of the content that I download for my spouse and kids that isn't available on YT or PBS.
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was at one point a perfectly good deal. Google Play Music was an awesome app and it came with ad-free YouTube for free. The family plan lets you share with 5 family members and was a great deal. Everybody is paying for some kind of music streaming service of some kind or another.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everybody is paying for some kind of music streaming service of some kind or another.

Count me out. I'm building a music library of my own with the help of my local library, thrift stores, and the internet. And, shit, I just got a record player, too.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Oh I have my own selfhosted music library as well. But that doesn’t really solve the problem of music discoverability. Back in the day we had radio and MTV. These days streaming services are still a must on some level unless you’re content to just listen to the music you already have forever.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I use listen brainz for music discovery. Every week it generates a jams playlist(similar to things i am known to like) and an exploration playlist(a bit more out there in terms of music taste). I then download those via the API and convert them to a CSV which gets put into SLSK download and all the music shows up in my music player automatically and I delete the songs if I dont like em. I was able to import my spotify listening history into it so I have a few 100k listens and its got a good idea of what I like.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Either my kids ask for something new, or i hit billboard charts once in a while and true up my collection.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I like to use the time filter and can listen in 5 languages; “oldies” in various genres, times, and places, isn't that hard to research--plenty of free internet radio out there.

Sorry to the new bands out there.

Edit: Also I find the mindset of finding the exact best music is kind of unhealthy. Building a tolerance for meh actually helps me discover things that don't immediately and instantly appeal to me, and I think that leads to more musical variety in the long run than the skip-happy attitude streaming encourages.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I do via India Apple Account. Only pay 4 bucks for a family account including Youtube Music.

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Majority of people that are not nerds

load more comments (3 replies)

I do. But I do it mainly to support the creators I follow. I'm not going to sign up for a bunch of patreon or channel subscriptions, but at least they can get their share of the subscription money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Youtube already makes more money than Disney, right? So of course they ramp up prices. It‘s a successful product after all and the line must go up. The more money it makes the more expensive it‘ll get.

That‘s why you should never give them anything in the first place and use an Adblocker instead.

I would also recommend Sponsorblock because most Youtube sponsorships are overpriced garbage or complete scams. It honestly seems too good to be true but it‘s open source and apparently can cover operational costs on just donations. What I really like about Sponsorblock is how you can curate your experience to a T. It lets you skip all sort of content that you may not like such as self-promotions, credits, previews/flashbacks, intros, and more. It comes really close to the internet highways concept I have long only dreamed about where you‘re served exactly what you want and you don‘t need a silly AI agent to do any of it.

DeArrow is another useful extension for Youtube, created to remove clickbait from your feed. It removes thumbnails and changes video titles based on user suggestions similar to Sponsorblock.

Youtube „Premium“ could never give you this experience for all the money in the world.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Gonna catch a lot of "get with the times" but an ad blocker and watching YouTube in browser on my phone - I've never seen the value of needing Premium to do adblocking or a whole ass app like Vanced. Maybe sponsorblock for more but like overall, my impression has always been YouTube Premium is a joke of a service that can never offer anything more than adblocking/sponsor block already just does from a browser on my phone.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

... people pay for youtube?

... you know you can just block the ads, right?

... and you don't need a propietary app to get youtube on a tv?

[–] Gagunga@feddit.dk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Problem for me is that YouTube is my main source of video entertainment. I like being a part of the reason creators can get paid.

Sure I hate giving google money, but if everyone does adblock and no one donates to creators, then there will be no quality content.

Many creators i watch probably has a patreon or similar, but I watch so many different ones that yeah, yt premium is the easiest way for me to support while being ad free.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

YouTube is also my main source of video entertainment.

I am very poor, but if I wanted to help fund Youtubers, I would just donate to their patreons or ko-fis or directly purchase a channel membership to them specifically.

You being lazy about how you support creatives you like is a choice, a choice that indicates your laziness is more valuable to you than you not giving Google money, so please don't lie to me when you say you hate giving Google money, you obviously don't.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Donating to what is ostensibly dozens of creators patrons would be not only a great deal of money but also kind of untenable to manage. If an adequate amount of YouTube subscription money goes to creators then there’s nothing really wrong with that. I wouldn’t say it’s lazy at all.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›