this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
77 points (97.5% liked)

politics

29858 readers
3109 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hungprocess@piefed.world 68 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Gee, if only those senators had some sort of mechanism they could use to depose an unfit president. Imagine if such a mechanism existed, they'd had the opportunity to use it TWICE, and instead they'd thrown their full-throated (ahem) support behind this kid-fucker each time. I bet they'd feel pretty silly right about now. 😐

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If they are not happy with Trump, they could easily express their feelings with an impeachment procedure. Most of the Democrats would probably even help with that.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago

Impeachment has to start in the House, finalized by conviction and removal in the Senate. Mike Johnson tables anything he thinks he's going to lose, and would never impeach his daddy. Unfortunately.

[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago

Yeah right, fucking performance art. They won’t do shit agains fascist daddy

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 7 points 15 hours ago

Until they actually break it’s not gonna mean a damn thing.

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure they'll stand up to him this time.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The best thing about lemmy is all you stand up comedians testing out your bits 🤣🤣🤣

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Just flew in from Reddit and boy my arms are tired.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Senators that are unable or unwilling to do their jobs should be fired. From a cannon.

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 17 hours ago

Into the sun.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 5 points 20 hours ago
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

by a cannon.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Then fucking do something about it.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 17 hours ago

If only the senate had any power. Alas, the US is ruled absolutely by its president.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

He can let Elron loot the Treasury database, but this is just too much apparently.

[–] BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

All the databases. The voter data was just as valuable if not more so than the Treasury data on everyone. all the data combined is the most valuable thing, it's the last thing they needed to train their Hitler ai models that would let a surveillance state exist without bottlenecks in data processing.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 16 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

" Im sure The president learned his lesson "

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

This mild disagreement on this one issue will teach him!

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 8 points 21 hours ago

Poor senators. Someone should be helping them. /s

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

What, donnie's self-dealing and/or creation of a set of loyal death squads is not cool with these guys?

This is the breaking point? Are they just butthurt that the death squads paid off with the billions stolen from Americans might be aimed at them? Are they mad they are not getting cut in on the massive steal being done by donnie's crypto schemes?

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 2 points 19 hours ago

This really, really reminds me of this bit David Cross made during Trump's first term, where he was starting to regret his vote for Trump.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This is the first I'm hearing about this "anti-weaponization fund." This country is so cooked.

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This fat lying piece of shit decided that this would suffice instead of his 10 billion dollar suit against the fucking IRS

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

That's what he always does; asks, says, or does something completely beyond legality or reason and then rolls it back to something less, but still outrageous and illegal and thinks it's a compromise.