this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
64 points (97.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

35841 readers
949 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Broadly speaking, you probably agree with the large majority of the views commonly attributed to whichever group you identify with - what are the exceptions? Something that if you mention without a caveat immediately makes people jump to conclusions or even attack you?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
  1. Bigotry and prejudice is always bad, even if it's not against a "protected class". Hating on white people, straight people, cis people, men, or anyone else for the way they were born, what their ancestors did makes the world a worse place. Heck, "white" itself is a nebulous concept that changes over time and is different depending on which racist you're talking to. Just because someone resembles your oppressor does not make them your enemy.

  2. Kind of related, but I don't broadly judge categories of things. I was at a party recently and someone asked me if I liked anime, and I responded that I like some anime. Most of it I don't like, but that's not specific to anime. In my experience, roughly 80-90% of all media is somewhere between "garbage" and "mediocre", and it's the 10-20% at the top that I look for. A lot of my favorite bands happen to be metal, but I'm not going to like every band that uses distorted guitars.

Perhaps another way of phrasing it is that I usually find that the parameters which define genre are often separate from the parameters that determine my personal enjoyment.

My theory is that most people are more concerned with the social groups around media than the media itself.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

what did they say after you said you liked anime?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TBi@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I keep getting downvoted because I advocate always voting left. Even if currently the democrats aren’t left wing, they are more left than Republicans. And if you keep voting for the most left candidate then over time they’ll keep shifting more and more left. Republicans will learn they’ll never win unless they start moving left so they’ll move left, then the Democrats will move more left.

Letting republicans win because the current democrat isn’t left enough is, IMHO, stupid.

[–] AwesomeAsian@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Thank God…. I hate the edgy leftists who think they’re being morally righteous by not voting or wasting their votes voting 3rd party. These people also never work on voting reform either which is essential in escaping our 2 party systems.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That having a better education is directly tied to income levels, so talking down to 'idiots' is actually some bougie bullshit.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Lemmy is a website full of people who are left-populists on paper, but hate the population.

The average Lemmite should never be in charge of anything that their IT degree doesn't qualify them for.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lemmy wants the baby without the labor pains.

"Destroy Capitalism!"

"But what about the millions who will die in the ensuing chaos!?!"

"Well dont do it that way!"

"Which way then?"

"DESTROY CAPITALISM!"

Yeah the system is fucked and definitely needs change, but its either gradual or violent and as someone who came up with rough crowds in rough places. Most people arent cut out for when the actual violence starts.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

practical and pragmatic reforms are boring. good policy making is boring.

hence why nobody gets excited by it. it's much more exciting to sit around daydream about the revolution than get involved in community or political groups or read public policy white papers that report the cause and effect of policies in a complex manner.

I used to work in public policy. It was really cool, until you realize nobody gives a fuck about making the world better. especially the politicans. all they can about is riling people up emotionally.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

all they can about is riling people up emotionally.

Damn, this shit goes all the way to the places where people signed up for boring policy work and can make a difference?

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

no, the policy nerds just want to to do good work. but good work isn't politically viable. they also typically aren't ideological because they are evidence-driven.

the politicians don't care about it, all they want is soundbytes to ragebait their voters. they want the 'evidence' to proof D is good, R is bad. or vice versa.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

IT degree

From my experience, that's giving the average lemmite way to much credit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Isolde@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

One of the things people constantly disagree with me about is children. Specifically how hard it really is to raise one, and that everyone isn’t meant to have them.

Many people don’t understand that where children begin, you end. There isn’t going to be time for things you used to do on your own time, at your own leisure. There are no natural born parents, people that can function on little sleep and overwhelming circumstances. You give up peace, money, autonomy and you don’t stop parenting until you’re gone. There are a large number of people who feel like one day, they’ll become a parent and that will be their identity. Some people start their journey in parenthood wholeheartedly believing their child is an extension of themselves; not a developing, unique person that may or may not be completely different- like no one else in the family.

Having children is the most important job that you will ever have. You don’t get to quit when you realize that maybe you aren’t cut out for it. That’s why it’s important to know yourself, and work on your trauma and shortcomings before they bleed into your children. If you aren’t prepared to make sure they have the absolute best you can provide them in all aspects of life; why are you having them? If you aren’t ready to let your priorities fall to the wayside while you guide a tiny human into themselves, you aren’t prepared.

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (12 children)

That Lemmy can be just as bigoted, hostile, and close-minded as the sites it set out to replace; it drives out views which aren't in line with the gestalt majority. This thread, then, mostly gets answers which are on the mildest end because those who actually hold opinions out of step with the majority know damn well not to speak up, or, well... be immediately othered.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago

Turns out that people are assholes regardless of platform

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That we should renationalise all public services here in the UK. I genuinely believe that. I'm essentially a left of centre capitalist, but I believe private companies using shared national infrastructure for shareholder profit under the lie of 'competition' is bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mech@feddit.org 15 points 4 days ago

I believe privately owned cars and on-street parking should be banned in cities, except for very few regulated exceptions, and replaced with municipal car sharing.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I’m a Democrat who values the 2nd amendment and doesn’t think we should just ban guns in the U.S. Stronger regulations and safety measures? Sure, absolutely. But I do think people should have the right to own and use firearms for recreation, hunting, personal protection, etc.

[–] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (7 children)

I think you'll find that most people by a wide margin agree that prohibition of anything generally doesn't work, and what they are looking for is regulations and enforcement.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I think that gender dysphoria is a mental illness, as it causes mental distress if not alleviated with transition, but that it's not shameful to have it any more than it's shameful to have autism, conversion therapy has been scientifically proven not to work, and just as people with diabetes manage their condition with insulin, transition is the best way to manage it so people with it can live happy lives.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

As a trans person yes, absolutely the anguish we feel for not being comfortable in our bodies is 100% mental illness. And people get upset because we see mental illness as a bad thing, a personal failure, instead of a condition to be treated.

Doctors have decided that transitioning, while it doesn't fix the problem of people not being born as their preferred gender, is much healthier treatment for the individual and society so that we can try to live happier lives where we get to feel as comfortable as cis people naturally feel.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In America its still not ok to be an atheist. Truly weird that it is ok to be part of several different mutually exclusive cults who all believe things that if they were not connected to a proper religion would get you laughed at but if you don't have a cult its not ok.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

on the coasts nobody cares. you must be talking about the south. the majority of the population in cities in atheist or non-practicing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 23 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I don't hate AI. It's fine. I don't love it either, but it's neat and often useful.

[–] Kataelyna@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Just gonna vent a little, don't mind me. I don't hate AI. I hate how it's being used. In a vacuum, AI is fine. But we don't live in a vacuum, we live in a capitalist hellscape where everyone saw how AI was going to be abused even before corporations started jumping on every chance they got to do so. Now we're stuck in the timeline where the public consensus is that using AI for any reason at all is seen as fundamentally unethical. People are zealously anti-AI and the nail is only getting pounded in further with new reasons to hate it appearing every other day. And it didn't have to be this way. Photography didn't try to pass itself off as painting, it had time to develop into its own art form. But AI didn't. Out the gate, it was being used deceptively, and continuously became worse. People want to abolish AI as a whole, but it isn't the problem. The problems run way deeper. Our world is a sinking boat and AI is showing us where all the leaks are. Lack of education, lack of access to mental health professionals, those in power using every chance they get to screw over the working class by cutting every corner. Any new technology in any form that can be used to exploit people, WILL be used to exploit people. The hate on AI may be justified but it's too generalized and unfocused to bring about any meaningful change. There needs to be regulation, but I fear that any laws that are passed will only benefit the rich and horrible.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Having children is borderline unethical given the capitalist hellscape they will be born into, the relatively high likelihood that they will not be able to live to old age due to risk of large parts of the planet becoming uninhabitable with climate change, and considering that reduced birth rates is the most ethical path to a lower population on the planet, which, though technically not a strict requirement of a greener future, certainly makes it a lot easier.

No shade for any kids living today or parents who choose to have them despite the above. I understand why people do it and I don't blame anyone for it. But it is worth pointing out that current birth rates in most countries are not sustainable, and the seemingly constant fearmongering about falling birthrates in places where it's low needs to go away. Yes, it's bad for the economy if the new generation is smaller than their parents. That's a problem with the system and its design (one of many), and not at all a rationale for having kids.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

Im a liberal who loves guns and offensive comedy.

[–] king_comrade@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Well I guess it's that I have a difficult time understanding trans folk. My belief is that we should be working towards accepting and loving our bodies regardless of how they are formed, with all of their flaws intact. I feel complicated towards cosmetic surgery as a result of this belief.
Obligatory caveat: I still love trans people, you're ALL valid and I continue to learn from you.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People that live as their chosen gender are happier. People who don't are much more likely to kill themselves. Hard to argue with that.

[–] king_comrade@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I mean yeah, hard agree, but Trans people ain't a monolith and I would like to learn more about them.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I would expand that to body modification in general. Tattoos, piercings, hair loss/removal treatments, shoe lifts, fake nails. Heck, you could even expand it to clothing and fashion.

For me it comes down to cost-benefit analysis. For me personally I find it pretty easy to change my mind, so that's usually "cheaper" than trying to change my body. Or you could say that I don't see much "benefit" to such changes to my appearance. To let go of my desire to appear a certain way, to stop caring about how others see me. Some might call that cis privelege, but I would argue it's something most cis people (at least in the US) struggle with too.

With the people I hang out with, i'm usually the only one without piercings to tattoos. Often I'm the only person with naturally colored hair (I do hope I go grey before losing it because it would be pretty cool to look like an old wizard, but if I lose my hair first I'll just embrace it).

At the same time, you could extend the conversation the other way to things like prosthetics. I just saw a meme on Lemmy yesterday about a closeted trans person who had a car accident with a moose and needed extensive surgery afterwords. So rather than restoring how they used to look they took the opportunity to fully transition. From my perspective, the opportunity cost of transitioning was lowered in that case.

I want to see humanity continue to pursue technology to reduce these costs though. People have been writing fiction for centuries about gender-swapping, even just for a couple of days. If there really was some magical pill that could swap your gender for a day or two, or was easily reversible, or if you could just transfer your brain between artificial bodies, I could see that leading to a lot more empathy in the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Isolationism. I completely reject the idea that my country's (the US) military interventionism is in any way driven by benevolence, or makes life better either for Americans (outside of war profiteers) or for the people of the country we're fucking with.

This is really controversial on here, for some reason. The fact that I want to leave other countries alone and focus on investing in schools and hospitals and public transit instead of bombs and tanks (I don't even really care if it's being spent domestically or abroad, so long as it's being spent on good things instead of bad things) causes a bunch of people to call me a "tankie" and say that I'm just as bad as a fascist. All because I say shit like, that I don't want to start shit with North Korea. I don't even give a shit about North Korea. Like, I just watched how Afghanistan played out and went, "You know, we probably shouldn't do shit like that again," and supposedly left-leaning people really, really hate me for it. It's genuinely bizarre. I even got attacked once for defending Biden pulling out of Afghanistan! People just love sticking our nose in other countries' business, for reasons I can't even begin to understand.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (14 children)

Religion and spirituality, broadly considered, are not inherently evil. That organized religion can justify great evils is a function of human weakness, nothing more.

Then again, this is coupled with a 'there is no god but that we create ourselves/god has no material existence, but is no less powerful for that'' POV, which is admittedly a weird one that I've been pulling at for a bit. Nothing to do with the nature of our reality or first causes, everything to do with our relationship to reality.

load more comments (14 replies)

I get why the whole "colorblind" thing ended, but what we replaced it with is even worse.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I think violence should be the last resort, not the first, when speaking of revolution.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 12 points 4 days ago (12 children)

I think trans athletes should be able to compete only in their assigned gender at birth category, if the sport is gender-segregated.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I think, and this may be a wild concept that bothers both sides of the discussion, that individual sports governing bodies (specific leagues, NCAA, etc) should be making the decisions and absolutely nobody in government should be involved.

People should be allowed to compete in sports, but it should be up to the individual sports governing body to decide how they slot people. And if there is an absolute ban in the league against use of hormones (aimed at preventing performance enhancing effects), then so be it. Those bans were in place prior to the trans people in sports discussion, I wouldn't say they are inherently biased. Take up the language of the rule with your local league to allow for medically necessary hormones for specific issues (including gender dysmorphia), but it is ultimately their prerogative on rules for their league. A senator doesn't need to weigh in.

But any poltician who so much as brings up trans people in sports should be immediately told to stay in their fucking lane.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›