this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
76 points (96.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

13898 readers
517 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I always find it interesting how Americans name public transport as "the" bus. As in singular.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Is this uncommon?
Expression is the same in German, even in the places with really good public transport: "Sollen wir den Bus nehmen?" - "Should we take the bus?"

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah, I imagine it's the same most places. You aren't taking all the busses. You're only taking the one. Multiple may exist, but they aren't the one you're on.

It's the same for cars, trains, etc.

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

At least where I am from, yes. Maybe very specific, but I always notice it.

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How do you phrase it? Is it "take a bus/buses"?

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Where I live we usually just say the station name. And because you have multiple fast lines to get to said station, it doesn't make sense to say, I take the bus, or I take the underground, or I take the train. Because all of them take you there. It's mostly about preference.

[–] NoPanko@feddit.uk 8 points 5 days ago

Here in the UK we do the same, I’ll say “I caught the bus from [place]”

[–] Qwazpoi@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

It's because if you say you take the bus it implies that you only need one and have no transfers. If somebody needs to go two cardinal directions to get to their destination they need two buses, ie they are lost to the American public transportation system and won't be seen until archeologists find their remains.

The hubris of those who wish to travel 7 kilometers or more using public transit in the States is punished. Those who wish to travel 5 miles swiftly learn that feat is only attainable in a a minimum of 4 hours or alternatively you can walk or bike and get run over at a crosswalk by a pickup with more blindspots than a Abrams tank.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 4 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Wait what, the US has distance based transit pricing?

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 8 points 5 days ago

Most importantly: the US has no actual system, just a patchwork of small providers.

So the answer is: yes! / no! / maybe!? / which transit?

All depending on location...

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 5 days ago

For some systems. The NYC subway and buses you pay once to get on and you can go as far as you want. NJ Transit right over the river you buy a ticket specific for your start and end, and it costs more if you go farther.

(I didn't watch the video because I'm supposed to be working and I don't like video as a format, but hopefully this is what you meant)

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

The San Francisco systems have at least some of that. You're supposed to use a card to get in and out of the trains and you're charged by distance.

Most systems don't really have such a thing, though many have one way or time-based tickets (like 2 hours).

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

We have it too in India (in addition to daily/monthly passes). I thought that was common?

[–] bassad@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago

I did not watch the video but suburbs accessibility is a global issue that needs real politic implication (I mean money) to be solved.

Here, 15km from a medium euro city, an express and affordable bus line arrived only last year thanks to a global metropolitan project. Before that there was only an overpriced line that was pretty far from many districts, it was faster and more convenient to go by bike, that's how I realised 15km is 20 min by car (without congestion), 40 by bike, 3h by feet, and random by bus.

[–] aim_at_me@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 days ago

I would say "take the bus", in the same way I'd say I'm taking the car, or the bike.