this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
323 points (100.0% liked)

90s Memes

423 readers
280 users here now

The Memiverse:
!y2k_memes@quokk.au
!philosophymemes@quokk.au
!sigh_fi@quokk.au

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ButtDrugs@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

I came to the comments hoping someone posted this. Its a classic and many young'ins will never know the pain.

[–] TRBoom@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

As a teenager in this era this sort of thing was awful especially when downloading certain ahhhhh videos…

There was a program I found that really helped called NetAnt.

You see back then you could download a small file quickly, but for larger files the distant server would throttle your connection so you wouldn’t hog all their bandwidth. Enter NetAnt.

NetAnt would send several different ‘ants’ to the server and request different parts of the same file. Then it would download it in chunks and create a file when it was done. You could also queue up different urls to pull from, you just had to know the file structure of the websites content and back then that was rarely obscured and was often logical and predictable. This ended being one of my first applications of my C++ classes to solve a problem I had. I made a little program that generated strings of urls based on what I thought the file structure was and then I dumped a thousand file requests into NetAnt to download while I was in school.

It worked! And I ended up with gigs and gigs of full porn videos from one of the nastiest websites back then by scraping downloads from the sample pages of 30 second clips.

I don’t think I actually watched much of it, the acquisition was the important part.

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

There was a bunch of download managers like that! I personally used GoZilla, and as many other apps, it would download in multiple pieces, and there were retries (so you wouldn't lose the progress if you disconnected for a second, or something like that).
But I did download a pirated version of Ultima Online, to play on a pirate server, through standard Internet Explorer dialog. The file was 314MB, it took a couple days while I was feeding my Internet Provider with time codes and asking my mom not to even think of touching the phone.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had GetRight to do that. The great thing about it was that it could also work with multiple mirrors. So you would download the same file from multiple servers at once.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

GetRight was the bomb.

Then I got fast internet (we're talking 25 MBit DSL here) and servers stopped being so stingy and download managers slowly became a thing of the past.

And then, a year or so ago, I had to work on a company VM that would randomly reset the connection to GitHub, from which I needed a rather large file. So I wrote a super cheap download manager and named it GetWrong in honor of the hero of my ISDN days.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's people like you who send all their web queries chunked as millions of different DNS queries to be assembled later, just so they don't have to sign up for the free airport wifi.

EDIT: YOU TOOK DOWN CLOUDFLARE, DIDN'T YOU!?

[–] TRBoom@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, I wanted to download the demo for Alpha Centauri

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Called a download manager, lots of different options.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Try downloading peer hosted torrents. If there’s only one person hosting and they stop, your estimated time will creep to 40+ years before it shows it as not downloading.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 week ago

I had some media that I really wanted but couldn't find anywhere (the Latin American Spanish dub of a movie). I could find unseeded torrents though.

I put the most promising one in my server and waited. Nothing for a month or so, then one day I check in and see it's at 5%. And it would sporadically continue for 3 more months until it completed.

As far as I could tell basically just some random person who happened to have this file was a both a casual torrenter and a leech. But unlike most leeches they didn't bother stopping the seeding of completed files, they just shut down the program altogether when they weren't downloading.

So they (with either throttled upload in their client or shitty upload speeds in general) would go on, open their torrent program, download something, and in doing so keep their program up long enough to seed a few MB before their download completed and they turned it off.

That file went on to be my highest seed ratio by far after lol

[–] Tramdan@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When you came back in the room it wouldn't be saying 3 minutes or 52 years. It would be saying 'are you sure you want to move file xxxxx.xxx' and it would have been saying that since you left the room.

[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't that how Windows still works?

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Windows admin here, YES it fucking is, this is why we robocopy.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

Download? This happened even while copying files or installing games/software off a CD.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The person writing this post also doesn't sell it.

This wasn't just for a download. This was for moving files generally.

See how it's an FTP transfer? As far as the system cares, it's like moving a file from one folder to another. And moving large files was huge back when you had a maximum drive size of 60 gigs in the OS, so you had to partition your large harddrives into like a dozen partitions and had to regularly move huge chunks of data to manage storage.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And then your brother picked up the phone to call his girlfriend...

[–] 0_0j@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No, no, he was in his room painting his airfix. It was my sister who did the picking up the phone to call her boyfriend and her other friends. We argued A LOT about this.

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

"I'll be there in a Microsoft minute."

I have no idea when I'll be there and there's a good chance I'll take a nap.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

NTFS is still soo slow compared to any file operation i do on Linux.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Linux: "I'm gonna copy this GB file instantly, and hope you don't call sync any time soon"

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Absolutely awful when it's some flash drive that just slows down to nothing at which point you'd rather cancel the tranfer, but you can't, but you also can't unmount because it's busy, so you just accept the loss, unplug and then re-format.

I only know how to add stuff to fstab with sync option, but what about other drives? I don't want to manually mount everything.

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You could use a custom udev rule: https://linuxmind.dev/2025/09/02/auto-mount-usb-with-udev-rules/

Not sure if auto-mounting is what you want though.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is why I bought GetRight.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

What a great program!

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Poor guy is probably still waiting for cc32e47.exe to finish downloading. Should be done in the next ten years or so.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

Netscape was bloatware, even by today's standards. Though to be fair, nothing back then was standard so you might as well pack all the libraries in one big ole sloppy zip

[–] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is still relatable today, since most rural areas only offer DSL, Comcast, or 1 bar of 4G (if you're not using starlink let alone those other satellite ISPs that shall not be named!) AND they decide to throttle you, all that changes is the download dialogue's title bar being windows 11 themed 😉

That reminds me of the time I filed a complaint with the FCC a few years over Centurylink's "fancy" dialup (DSL, we had a 10 Mbps plan but frequented approximately 1 byte/s) and CENTURYLINK sent me a letter with my complaint in it!

Sounds like illegal muni/co-op networks are the way to go.

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Fun fact: Even if the estimation were correct, you wouldn't have had to wait 34yrs anyways since it didn't took that long to get better network speed

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Good ol' days when I used to leave the computer on downloading 1 GB of software overnight, and I would pray to the gods in the morning that it hadn't aborted halfway through.

[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

Legends say the file is still downloading

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Even other adults that lived through this with me have forgotten

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Ahh, FlashGet, you used to be a beautiful thing. At least before they turned it into an adware shitfest. Glad I migrated off Windows before then.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

real Gs used download managers to be able to resume later.

[–] waggz@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that wasn't even a guarantee in my day. a lot of webservers didn't support resume.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is resume just client/server support for byte serving requests? Pretty sure that was around with HTTP/1.1 in the late 90s, but my memory of it was client support in Netscape for downloads wasn't really there, so most people probably never used it.

[–] waggz@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago

idk the technical specifics on it but standards were mostly loosely followed suggestions back then. i still run in to issues today with some downloads not even knowing the total size. i just remember being on dial up and hoping if i let it go all night i wouldn't have to start anew in the morning.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

I remember being amazed when I could download an mp3 in a little under an hour. It took weeks to get Pink Floyd’s entire discography- and then another week or so to tag the ones labeled Lynnard Skynnard or Blue Oyster Cult.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

So much this.