this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
704 points (98.5% liked)

News

33138 readers
3461 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://ibbit.at/post/106713

Sarah, a 44-year-old single mother in Maryland, was down to the last $20 on her EBT card as of Monday, wondering how she would feed herself and her two preteen boys as the government shutdown dragged on. She’d been out of work since May, after the Trump administration made sweeping cuts to federal contracts and eliminated her job in public health.

She had been rationing her Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, benefits for over a month, unsure of when, if ever, the deposit would hit her account again. “It’s been awful,” said Sarah, who asked to be identified by her first name only because she fears speaking out could hurt her job search. But the Maryland mom said she was willing to sacrifice if it meant millions of Americans could afford their health insurance.

“The pitch they made, it made sense,” Sarah told The Intercept. “Everyone knew it was going to be painful, but it was important … and they just wasted it all.”

On Sunday, a group of eight Democratic senators, including Minority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., cut a deal with Republican leadership to end the government shutdown. They did it without forcing Republicans to agree to any of the major concessions Democrats said they were fighting to secure, which included a reversal of Medicaid cuts and an extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies. The deal is slated for a vote in the House on Wednesday evening, and it looks likely to pass.

[

Related

Key Senate Dem Says Party Caved on Shutdown to Make a Symbolic Point About the GOP](https://theintercept.com/2025/11/10/democrats-republicans-government-shutdown-aca-deal/)

While Senate Republican leadership agreed to hold a vote on the subsidies, the legislation is more than likely dead in the water, especially since Democrats forfeited their main piece of leverage. As a result, tens of millions of Americans are projected to see their premiums skyrocket, and an estimated 7.8 million low-income Americans will outright lose their insurance through Medicaid.

The Intercept spoke with four SNAP recipients who said they’re furious that Democrats squandered the sacrifice they made for the last month to ensure access to health care for millions of Americans — just as voters rewarded the party for finally fighting back against Republicans with major electoral victories last week.

“We sacrificed and we would continue to sacrifice because we understood what the stakes were. People’s health care was at stake,” said Delight Worthyn, 67, a SNAP recipient with lupus living in New Haven, Connecticut. “And that they would cave for nothing after we have all gone through. … I only feel betrayed.”

Though the Supreme Court has paused a federal judge’s order that the Trump administration pay full SNAP benefits for the month of November, some recipients have started receiving full or partial benefits. The SNAP funding available varies by state.

“Don’t talk about me and my food insecurity to justify kicking people like me off of my health care.”

Sasha Slansky, 33, a full-time master’s student at Queens College at the City University of New York who works a series of odd jobs to pay her bills, said it’s “insulting” for Democrats to use SNAP recipients as a justification for caving to Republicans and President Donald Trump**.** In his floor speech, Durbin invoked SNAP recipients as one of the reasons he was agreeing to Republicans’ shutdown deal.

“Don’t talk about me and my food insecurity to justify kicking people like me off of my health care,” said Slansky, noting that Democrats seem not to have taken into account the overlap between SNAP recipients and people who receive Medicaid and their insurance through the Affordable Care Act. “It’s insane, and it’s insulting, and it’s also just so wildly out of touch.”

Nearly 30 million of the 38.3 million people who received SNAP in 2022 were enrolled in Medicaid. The number of SNAP recipients has since risen to 42 million people, as of this year.

“I’m also on Medicaid,” Slansky said. “And as Bernie Sanders and Zohran Mamdani and many, many Democrats have made clear, this has the potential to kick [millions] of Americans off of Medicaid, which likely includes me.”

Natalie, a delivery driver living in Lynnwood, Washington, said she managed to spend only half of her SNAP benefits for the month, stretching meals that would normally last her two days to three or four. She received her benefits for the first time since October on Tuesday, but she said it doesn’t erase the hardship of the last month.

Though the Supreme Court has paused a federal judge’s order that the Trump administration pay full SNAP benefits for the month of November, some recipients have started receiving full or partial benefits. The SNAP funding available varies by state.

“It felt like we were making a small sacrifice, skipping [meals], because we felt like we were doing something to help save people, and that we were doing something good for the country, and to have our only leverage just handed over,” said Natalie, who asked to be identified by her first name because she’s transgender and wanted to avoid transphobic harassment. “It feels like it wasn’t for anything.”

[

Related

The President Is Perfectly Fine If You Starve](https://theintercept.com/2025/11/07/government-shutdown-snap-trump-hunger/)

Natalie said she wishes that Democrats had built off of their electoral victories in New York, Virginia, New Jersey, and California earlier this month to pressure Republicans, instead of immediately disarming when they had the upper hand.

“The MAGA Republicans were on the ropes. They were getting the blame. Why didn’t they keep using that and pushing the narrative, the truth, on social media and traditional news that Republicans are doing this to people?” said Natalie. “That was a really strong message, and it was one that people were willing to sacrifice for.”

The post SNAP Recipients Crushed by Democrats Caving on Shutdown: “They Just Wasted It All” appeared first on The Intercept.


From The Intercept via this RSS feed

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

These assholes literally made sure that this shutdown got everyone the worst of all worlds

Government was shut down

Longest shutdown ever is now solved by Trump, he'll claim

Government employees went without payment (may still not even get it now)

People went without food

Democrats budged

Trump won

It's literally everything wrong. They had one job, keep steadfast, don't bend the kn.... Never mind, Democrats are again the good little pussies that they've always been.

Your country is sooooo fucked.

[–] tym@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Wait until they kill health care subsidies days after open enrollment closes. That's one year without ANY healthcare or being locked into ridiculous, crippling prices.

They're guaranteeing mid-terms get suspended due to martial law. Save my comment. It's a done deal at this juncture.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

My entire life I’ve watched the democrats pretend to fight while assisting in the destruction of the working class and assisting the republicans in moving the country right by using political theater to not actually fight back. We’re at the point where everything left of Hitler is the “radical left” so…

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

I am yet to see any sign that mainstream Democrats aren't in on it. The US needs a chain of FDRs one after another for like 50 years to undo all this damage.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 10 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Friendly reminder to all Americans that while a year and some weeks ago was a really bad time to challenge the Democratic party establishment (because in the case of Harris vs Trump, Harris would've been preferable, but that went to shit anyway), now is an excellent time to challenge the Democratic party. Vote 3rd party in local elections and even midterms, primary every god damn old guard Dem you can find, and make sure that the entire party knows how disappointed their constituents are and why.

Maybe it'll work, or maybe democracy is too far gone in the US. But in the years between presidential elections is the only really good time to challenge the party.

Either way the world is watching because for a bunch of shitty reasons the entire world is dependent on the US in a lot of ways.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They are undoing New Deal. It's all part of the plan.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The dems are basically hatori hanzo of self inflicted wounds

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Hattori Hanzō was a samurai of the Sengoku era. He served the Tokugawa clan as a general and is credited with saving the life of Tokugawa Ieyasu, later helping him to become the ruler of united Japan. Hanzō was known as an expert tactician and a master of sword fighting

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago

Yes, that Hattori. He was named after an elf from Witcher 3. And the sword guy from Kill Bill.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Fetterman, Schumer, fucking Tim Kaine. Treasonous snakes. I hope they all rot in hell for selling out. The can is being kicked down the road and republicans will be ready next time.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago

Tim Caine, if I recall correctly, was the dipshit who Elizabeth Warren ripped a new asshole with her line in a debate:

"I don't know why anybody would go to all the trouble to run for president just to talk about all the things we can't get and can't do."

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They were all retiring or not going to be seeking their positions next year so they all had no accountability going forward. Shows how much they cared about the people.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 6 points 21 hours ago

The party trots out a few people to performatively fall on the sword, ones that it doesn't even impact ultimately, and then they get to pretend that people "broke ranks" when the capitulation comes from the top down.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I hope they all rot in hell for selling out.

They'll be fetted at dinner parties hosted by the Responsible Moderates For A Wonderful Future PAC and offered board seats on shell companies that handle $40B in tax evaded funded when they retire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Reminder that Kane is who was going to be VP in 2016. So he would have been the same as VP/President if Clinton won and he got elected after.

Edit for my current devoted fan:

spoiler Why are you downvoing me in posts and theads you're not even part of? Man you really are a sealion troll. No wonder you had to make your own instance, no one wants your ass.


[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Just imagine, President Kane!

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

Still better than Trump.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

The only thing I can figure is that they weren't making any headway on Obamacare, and people were going to starve soon, and the Epstein thing was stalled during the shutdown.

So they calculated that while they'll lose health care, people will eat, and they will go after both health care and Epstein for the Midterms.

So some Dems voted to end the shutdown, and some MAGAs voted to release the Epstein Files. It was a bipartisan solution for a change.

But it sucks. They should have held out, and beaten the MAGAs with ALL of it.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Realistically, the Epstein files are less important. They may identify some prominent people as sexual predators but it probably won’t surprise anyone, change any minds, or affect people’s quality of life. While we dhould keep up the pressure, this is not worth shutting down the government for.

ACA, and now SNAP, directly affects the lives and health of our most vulnerable. This is a line in the sand worth drawing. This is worth shutting down the government. This is worth indefinitely shutting it down

Even worse if this is just more games. Making everyone suffer for a year, clearly at the hands of MAGAts, in the hope of cementing votes next year.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 19 hours ago

I was all for leaving it shut down until the Midterms, and having the entire Democratic campaign for 2026 be a giant food and health care drive for hungry and suffering Americans. Let them know that it's MAGAs taking it away, but Dems are trying to help as much as possible, until the MAGAs give up, or lose in the election. It puts the Dems in contact with the people who need their help the most. Imagine if the campaign could tell everybody who wasn't getting food and health care that it will immediately start back up if the Dems win, with repayments? All you have to do is make sure everyone who comes to the food bank, or the free health screenings, gets registered to vote, and knows where to go. Then call those people before election day, and offer to drive them to the polls.

A LOT of those people are going to be MAGAs, and with MAGA starving their family, and Dems willing to feed and care for them, they may start to realize that the Dems aren't the slobbering hyenas that the Conservative Propaganda Machine makes them out to be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More motive to bust out the guillotines? When the hungry can no longer go to buy food, the rich become the food.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You could not pay me to even consider that. Feed his corpse to the pigs and set those pigs free.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I know fascist flesh is vegan but still, that's nasty don't eat that you don't know whats in it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 82 points 1 day ago (2 children)

GOP - fascist authoritarian party

DNC - Controlled opposition party

The DNC must get rid of all their corporate stooges and their stooges like AIPAC Shakur before it can be effective and win elections.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 84 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

All with shit eating grins on their faces. Useless party.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Maybe this is actually good. If both parties keep behaving in the worst way possible for the population, maybe the US can finally rid itself from the two party system that keeps destroying the country.

Who am I kidding though, most people will keep voting for their party even when their house is literally set on fire by their representative. It will be something like 45/45 at best

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I don't expect so.

The Democrats are unlikely to enact meaningful change, sure, but if they consistently started winning it would create a political environment more conducive to change in the future. The republicans being unable to win would start shifting things in the other direction and it's delusional to think otherwise.

On the other hand, if both parties piss everyone off then the needle doesn't move as the parties lose support in equal measure. This seems to be where things currently sit.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

See, the Dems don’t want things to change just as much as the Republicans. They are all capitalists.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

most people will keep voting for their party even when their house is literally set on fire by their representative.

They'll vote and they'll cheer, because they were told the house needed to be set on fire. And they'll believe this because every single news organization in the country - from local to national - is part of a holding company owned by Arson Inc.

At some point you have to look past politics as a collection of "stupid" individuals and see a machine that exists to manufacture consent.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] grunk@piefed.social 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

GOP: “Let’s see how much money we can save by starving the most vulnerable amongst us”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 67 points 1 day ago

Much like the orange bell-end handling COVID - all they had to do was nothing and they couldn't even do that.

load more comments
view more: next ›