this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
271 points (100.0% liked)

World News

50787 readers
1695 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Roughly 200 workers, including a man identified as Kim, are accusing ICE of unlawful detention, racial profiling, human rights violations and excessive use of force. The raid targeted a joint Hyundai Motor—LG Energy Solution EV battery factory under construction near Savannah, Georgia.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't wait to hear from SCotUS how ICE has Qualified Immunity to do this.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not a lawyer, but it seems like the current legal precedent and interpretation of Section 1983 means that people can not sue "federal agents" for violations of their freedoms protected by the Constitution and it's amendments.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 4 points 17 hours ago

They might be able to target the agency itself but I doubt it. So, the recourse would be to sue the available government body. So, they’d have to get in line to sue the US government. I think they’d be able to do this bc of the Federal Tort Claims Act.

[–] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

“Including a man identified as Kim” My apologies but aren’t there like millions of Kim’s in Korea?

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

21.5% of South Koreans have the surname Kim.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Fair point.

Now, how many millions of those men named Kim were abducted from their job by a paramilitary and forcibly deported when staying in the USA legally and are still dealing with the aftermath of their lives being uprooted unexpectedly?

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Probably like 30 out of the 200. It really is a ridiculously common name.

Edit: I just looked it up, 20% of South Koreans are called Kim.

[–] FlowerFan@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 days ago

So 40 out of 200

[–] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

I dunno. How many licks does it take to get to the tootsie roll center of a tootsie pop?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Maybe the really unusual thing which made it worth mentioning the "man named Kim" in that group is that out of 200 Koreans there was only one man named Kim?