this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
677 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

17338 readers
2386 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Philharmonic3@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Interval vs. Ratio

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Kelvin and degrees Celsius are friends, though.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago

Not according to the meme. 0 K is -273(.15) C.

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think one is supposed to be radians, not sure why they both have the ° though, cause radians aren’t a degree. Should be just R the way Kelvin is just K.

[–] Bob@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is clearly the Rankine scale, which is an absolute temperature scale just like Kelvin. Which means that 0 K and 0 °R is exactly the same.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 89 points 2 days ago (2 children)

0 Kelvin = 0 Rankine

Also, both °R and °Ra are Rankine. So 3 of the 5 people in the bottom picture also agree.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And the other two can shake at -40

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

They shake under the table, but try to keep up appearances.

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think none of K, R, and Ra may be pointing at each other.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hmm. To my eye, K is obviously pointing at either R or Ra (and F), R has to be pointing at Ra (and K or F), and Ra is pointing at R or K (and C).

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

K is obviously pointing at R because Rankine is an abomination in the same vein as pound-mole and thousands of an inch.

Motherfuckers, metric is right there, get your disgusting units out of here.

Anyone who uses either of these units in the last 40 or 50 years, I would like to physically fight with you. I have never thrown hands.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (7 children)

From John Bazell “In metric, one milliliter of water occupies one cubic centimeter, weighs one gram, and requires one calorie of energy to heat up by one degree centigrade—which is 1 percent of the difference between its freezing point and its boiling point. An amount of hydrogen weighing the same amount has exactly one mole of atoms in it. Whereas in the American system, the answer to ‘How much energy does it take to boil a room-temperature gallon of water?’ is ‘Go fuck yourself,’ because you can’t directly relate any of those quantities.”

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I was in a situation similar to this one in real life: having to adjust the salt level in a pool.

In metric:

The pool is 8*4 m long and 2m deep on average, the current salt level is 2g/l and the salt comes in 20kg bags.

How many bags of salts do I need to pour in the pool to adjust the salt level to at least 3g/l ?

Answer:

! The pool contains 8m4m2m= 64m³ or 64000l of water, I need an extra 1g/l of salt per litres so 64000l*1g/l = 64000g or 64 kg. So with 4 bags I'll have enough salt.

In imperial:

The pool is 20*10ft long and 5ft deep on average, the current salt level is 2000ppm and the salt comes in 40lbs bags.

How many bags of salts do I need to pour in the pool to adjust the salt level to at least 3000ppm?

Answer:

! I'm just gonna drive to the store with my truck to pick up 2 bags at the time and see if it's enough, no way I'm doing the calculation.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Home pools here are almost never saltwater.

We simply add chlorine tabs until the pH is the correct color on the strips. Even if we knew it would be 62.4 lbs of salt, it's not like you can buy a 62.4 lb bag of salt.

But yeah, it is a lot harder to do applied math in the US, which is why science here went metric :)

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

It's a shame because salt water pools are honestly so much better and I think overall it was cheaper for us as well.

Instead of adding chlorine every week the salt system just keeps the chlorine level at the right minimal level all the time. So no chlorine smell in the pool and the pool was much cleaner.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

°RA sound like the sun's temperature

[–] MasterOKhan@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago

As far as equations go, "one degree RA equals 5500 degree Celsius divided by joking" is unusually abstract 🤔

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

-40C = -40F

Also 0lbs does not equal 0kg when there’s no gravity.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

huh?

Mass doesnt change with gravity

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Typically, lbs is not mass, it's weight/force.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

isn't that lbf?

The pund itself is defined as 0.45359237 Kg

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lbs can be lbf or lbm, but usually is referring to lbf, which is 0.4536 kg at 1g.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago

when comparing to kg I will assume the mass unit, since comparing a mass value to a force has no meaning.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

no mass multiplied with gravity still results in no force, 0 Lb = 0 Kg; 0 Lbf = 0 N

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] omxxi@feddit.org 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Would be better ordered like F° C° K° R°

[–] 0_0j@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You mean K° F° C° R°epeat

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Found the Americans.

I kid, but it's °C, not C°

And K had no degrees at all.

The other two units are not mentioned in this household.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Kelvin is objectively the most accurate. Celsius fans cope.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 45 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

Er... every system of measurement is accurate, tautologically.

0°F = 0°F because 0°F = 0°F, by definition.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago

For some reason my brain dropped the 'L'.

Sitting here wondering how Kevin does it...

It's a nice day today. Can't be more than 300 degrees

I'm not so sure

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

Depends on your measuring tool. A thermometer that measures in K but has an error margin of +2 to -2 K is less accurate than a thermometer that measures in F and has an error margin van -0.1 and +0.1 F

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're both calibrated against a stupid wet molecule that carbon based life on this planet is addicted to.

Introducing: the Nihon. 0Nh is the freezing point of Nihonium at 1 bar pressure, and 100Nh is the boiling point. Well, theoretical freezing and boiling points. Nihonium is one of those elements that doesn't stick around long enough to be studied. But we thought really hard about it, did some shit with particle accelerators, and we're pretty sure these numbers are good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] warm@kbin.earth 7 points 2 days ago

I'm coping, Celsius is just as accurate as Kelvin, because it based on it.

Kelvin - 273.15 = Celsius

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there's a whole host of temperature scales, some of which look similar, some look different, some scale the same at the same temperature difference but have different zeroes, and at least one works backwards. Thank goodness there's only three you're likely to see in the wild these days, I'd hate to have to keep in mind whether or not those degrees are not Celsius or Fahreheit, but... idk, Newton? Réamur? Rømer? Delisle?

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More like only 4 than 3, at least in the us, I unfortunately run into Rankine at my job on occasion.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

Welp, it is like Kelvin, just with Fahrenheit step.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know the F C and K, but what are the others?

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

R is to F what K is to C. Ra is used sometimes because there are other R meanings.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

Use molecular wiggles mw

load more comments
view more: next ›