this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
216 points (98.2% liked)

News

33138 readers
3179 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The number of detainees in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody increased to 66,000 this week, setting a new record high as Trump intensifies his crackdown on illegal immigration, according to internal Department of Homeland Security data obtained by CBS News.

Never before has ICE held so many detainees facing deportation at any given time, according to officials, historical data and immigration policy experts.

ICE's detainee population has ballooned by nearly 70% since Mr. Trump took office for a second time in January, when ICE was holding around 39,000 individuals in its detention system. The previous high before Mr. Trump's second administration was recorded during his first term, in 2019, when ICE held about 56,000 detainees at one point, according to government figures compiled by researchers at Syracuse University.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Private companies get about $100 per day per person they imprison. That's why they want to grab as many as possible. Then it will clog up the courts and they can keep them even longer.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Remember, every accusation is a confession. And republicans abuse dems of faking numbers. If-so fact-so they could be pumping their numbers to get more money from the government without actually having that many people. I mean the number should be zero but I wouldn't be surprised if it comes out these numbers are inflated.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 63 points 1 week ago

Concentration camps.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How many of them are actually illegal immigrants?

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Technically? Probably more than you'd expect. But in like a "someone forgot one check box on one document 30 years ago and it just never got fixed because really who cares it's just a formality" kind of way

[–] BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Personally, I don't give a shit if someone came here legally or not. Crossing an imaginary government line on a map somewhere isn't a real crime.

In the US, it isn't a crime at all. It's a civil infraction. This whole thing is a farce.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 17 points 1 week ago

Even though imaginary government lines on maps have existed for several hundred years now, it has only been considered a crime to cross them for about 100 years.

The hard border, border control, etc didnt exist until after 1900. Before that, people in northern Mexico and the southern US just went about their business in both countries as needed, and it was a significantly more functional region of the world.

They rally against the cartels as the reason for needing a more and more extreme hard border, but the hard border is what fucked up the entire region in the first place, thereby creating the conditions for the cartels to thrive

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wonder if this is costing us more than just letting the courts do their jobs.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

The cost is going to be much worse than money. This will be an inescapable shame, a stain that history won't forget, which is saying a lot when compared to the rest of the shit America does.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have no doubt this is costing the economy millions of dollars. Most of these people are working and spending and paying sales and fuel taxes, and those that are trying to become citizens would be paying income taxes.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

But hey, CoreCivic and the GEO Group are raking in the cash, and that's all that matters.

/s

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

A record high... Of course its a record high.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There’s no way these people are being treated humanely. It takes time to establish the infrastructure, train new staff, and do all the other things necessary to expand this much and still treat people humanely.

The conditions must be breaking so many laws, and most of these people haven’t been charged with a crime, right?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago

detainee population

a rather forced euphemism

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Likely a lot more than what is being reported.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We are paying to house (poorly) all of these people, unnecessarily in most cases, when there are plenty of citizens with housing needs. Massive waitlists of people. Hell, abducting working immigrants puts even more people at risk of homelessness. Is he looking to restart Hoovervilles?

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Why not? He's already working on bread lines.