this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
618 points (99.5% liked)

politics

26349 readers
2881 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 233 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I cannot think of even but one single thing that Donald Trump has done to benefit the working class. Not even a single thing, no matter how small or petty.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 79 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

He's getting rid of the Mexicans taking their job...

The jobs that none of them want to do in the first place...

For wages none of them would accept...

Wait...

[–] Dhs92@piefed.social 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

See, for me this line of thinking is troublesome. It implies we have to or should rely on the exploitation of desperate people willing to work for pennies on the dollar because they have no legal recourse.

Fuck ICE, this administration, and everything else that's going on but let's not normalize the exploitation of desperate people to keep the machine churning.

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So advocate for better wages for them. I bet even at $20/hr you would struggle to get an American to do the job.

Getting rid of them only creates problems.

Torturing them on the way out, is just evil.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Oh I'm not implying that's a good thing at all... Thats what the MAGAts seem to believe, they just never get to that last word there, never get to the realization point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stupe@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

I'd prefer we get rid of the CEOs that are giving our jobs away.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This seems alright, no?

The executive order directs the HHS and the Treasury and Labor departments to ensure hospitals and insurers disclose “actual prices of items and services, not estimates” and take action to ensure “pricing information is standardized and easily comparable across hospitals and health plans” including prescription drug prices.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unironically yes, and it's sad that that's the case. However, he did issue a similar EO in 2019 which didn't do much; the administration claims that it lowered costs on the most expensive procedures by 6%, but whether that's true or not the cheapest procedures became about 3% more expensive. Something like 20% of hospitals and insurers were ever in compliance, which Trump of course blames the Biden administration for; and attempts to make the EO a law went nowhere on the Hill.

But yes, healthcare price transparency is a good thing. Still, I'm a bit suspicious; because the insurance companies actually welcomed the EO when it was first signed. I can't figure that one out.

[–] dion_starfire@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hospitals would often have two prices - the insurance price, and the cash price. If you told them that you didn't have insurance, the price could go down drastically from the estimate. Now they're required to charge the insurance company and the uninsured the same amount.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I believe that's always been the case, officially. It certainly was about fifteen years ago, when I worked in pharmacy. I know there are some ways that hospitals had of getting around it (like charging the full amount and putting it on a payment plan, but then immediately forgiving the remaining balance after one payment), but I don't think those loopholes have been closed even still.

[–] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Some of them burned a few calories standing up from the couch and walking into the polling station to vote. They've burned through more savings to pay for groceries and everything else because of all the trumpflation in both terms, but they at least burned off most of a French fry.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago

He killed NAFTA, which was good for Mexican workers (NAFTA exploited Mexican labor)

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Banned those harmful artificial food dyes.

Aaand that's about it.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

"Harmful"

I prefer my substance control to be based on evidence, not vibes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't even think America is about us. Republican or Democrat I honestly think we are played out. It's basically a repetitive good cop bad cop lifestyle.

People should remember what real humanity is and live for that more and America less.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] architect@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 week ago

I have no idea why anyone would ever think Donald Trump of all people would ever want to do that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 122 points 1 week ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You just knew when these assholes kept using obviously-coordinated terms like "waste, fraud and abuse" and kept parroting phrases like that when Elon was doing stupid shit like waving around a chainsaw while in a k-hole, that this is the kind of thing they are talking about.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Of course, this saved americans money. The only thing they like doing more than starving poor Americans, is making people pay more for shit so their corporate owners make money.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Thanks Intuit. Absolutely not using TurboTax ever again since I learned they lobbied to maintain the complicated tax code so they get to keep selling their software.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

That effort is what finally pushed me to the super sketchy-sounding freetaxusa. Its actually been great for the last few years - easier than TurboTax and cheaper

[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This didn’t happen overnight. For over 20 years, Intuit has fought tooth and nail to stop Americans from having a truly free, government-run tax filing system. Back in the early 2000s, they lobbied Congress and cut a deal with the IRS. They were promising to offer a “Free File” option so the government wouldn’t build its own system. Then they turned around and buried that option so deep most people never found it, even using code to hide it from Google.

When people did try to file for free, they were steered into paid versions with deceptive “free, free, free” ads. They were so deceptive that Intuit had to pay $141 million in settlements. Now, after decades of manipulation, Direct File is being terminated. This is exactly what they’ve wanted all along. It’s the result of relentless lobbying, lies, and corporate greed, all to keep Americans paying for something that should have been free from the start.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Agreed. Probably for most filers, the IRS (and state governments) could just automatically do the work. They already have most of or all of the data. The idea that you have to pay some no-value-add middleman for the "privilege" of filing your taxes is crazy.

For people that have more complicated scenarios, and are trying to take every single deduction, have to hire a CPA and so on...that's maybe where these middlemen provide something of value.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gov could do this, like most other countries. Send a card to the person saying this is what you owe, if you agree just sign.

Instead we get the gov saying 'we know what you owe, lets see if you can figure it out too. And if youre wrong, you owe us more.'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (4 children)

We should file all of our taxes ourselves through the paper option. No digital taxes this year. It's not that hard if all you have is a W2, it takes longer but it also will mean you file for free and more importantly takes the government longer to process it. You can get the papers for free from the library.

Throw dirt into the gears.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Blue States should use this as an opportunity to create an open-source tax filing coalition. That way, if they need to prevent taxes from reaching the feddies or want to secede, some of the infrastructure would already be in place.

Also, it would just be nice to get tax filing done without hassle.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I DONT Understand why Voters REJECTED this at the Polls last night!

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

Maybe this is a "whoosh", but this is something the IRS (under Trump) decided to do. So no voting was directly involved.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I predict a lot of people are going to just not file taxes, and I expect the IRS won't have the resources to do anything about it.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Too bad most of us have already been paying taxes and need to file in order to get a refund.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the gubment knows what I owe or overpaid, why the fuck do we do our taxes, except to pay a corporation?!

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, the point now is just the end of your comment

pay a corporation

The super rich are trying to collapse governments and turn society into religio-corpo-city-states where they can be neofeudalist kings where their family line maintains through history no matter how technology changes. No different than kingdoms of the past where it's mostly suffering combined with war, except they've convinced crypto bros and other idiots that they'd be knights in this system and are spending boatloads of money to achieve their goals.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Enlightenment

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The more popular plan among them seems to be this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy

If you read through it you'll find a lot of the things in project 2025 that came out of nowhere (like taking Canada, Greenland, and Panama) are actually goals of the movement

Oh, and Elon's Grandpa was in the movement, and the heritage foundation was started by the same group

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately what’s been shown in the past is the less resources the IRS has, the more likely they are to just go after the smallest issues, they can automate and garnish wages on people who don’t have the resources to fight it. Then they just avoid the rich because they don’t have the resources to go up against well paid tax attorneys

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you don't have vehicles to manipulate your assets like the rich, they will need only glance at your papers to see the mistake. The IRS loses money hiring auditors and experts to understand if a business is a business or a charity a charity, those are the common tricks the rich use.

You aren't going to hide what your employer paid to you and how much tax you paid the IRS. Even putting in your IRA or house deductible is easy to automate and thus easy to check.

Cash app has free filing though, would recommend.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 16 points 1 week ago

The Trump Administration: Fuck you America. Eat shit and worship me.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why, because fuck you and yours.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Because the tax preparation companies paid them a lot of money.

[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well funk. I used this the first time last year. Every year prior I got ass fucked by intuit. I guess this year I'm going back to papers and mailing it.

[–] CLOTHESPlN@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Plugging freetaxusa, I've used it for ~4 years. Only cost is ~15 for state taxes. If you used the free file option chances are freetaxusa won't have any issues with your taxes

[–] spoke0thedevil@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've used it the last 4 years, it's as easy as TurboTax and way cheaper

[–] zipsglacier@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Another comment for freetaxusa. The name sounds like a scam for boomers, but it's legit and good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PeachMcD@union.place 10 points 1 week ago

@CharlesDarwin

OFC they did
Those fuckers

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Man, I wish I owned a government, must be cool to make your money by forcing your serfs to give you their money for free stuff

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Trump was reached for comment, and he shared "because fuck you" as the reason.

[–] JoshsJunkDrawer@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

I think he'd be more likely to say "what are taxes?"

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Of course they are.

load more comments
view more: next ›