this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
349 points (99.4% liked)

Neat - For neat stuff you found

1280 readers
25 users here now

For stuff that's neat. Neat article? Neat video? Neat pic of a bug you saw? All good. Neat meme? Ehhh... take it to the meme subs.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 59 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Imagine all the artworks, music, and scientific discoveries that would be made if people were just paid a basic income and set free to pursue endeavors that strike their curiosity.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Art, music, scientific discoveries

Speedrunners, challenge gamers, simracers, mod creators,

[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 4 points 2 weeks ago

Open Source Software

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

So much speedrunning

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Decades ago, a video game mod is what led me into computer programming.

Intellectual curiosity comes in all forms. What we lack is the time to pursue it and explore where it leads us.

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

If anything it proofs that people can overcome almost every challenge

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would enjoy not having to work about money

I would spend my time writing software and doing math, cooking, and making art

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, that's my schtick

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

Wait a minute wait a minute. Do you mean to tell me that if you look after your population instead of making them miserable, then the outcome is good? But, but, where's the ProFIt MOtiVe? Where's in incentive? People won't just work and make themselves a functioning part of society just to make themselves feel good! They need a whip. And chain. And constant threats of easily treatable illnesses going untreated if they don't comply.

Unbelievable.

"paid"

You mean invested?

why when giving money to rich folk for then to hopefully make jobs is called investing

but when giving it to people directly to generate wealth it's called "paid" , like it's some charity.

Invest in people, best investment.

[–] j_0t@thelemmy.club 14 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds good

[–] Angelevo@feddit.nl 8 points 2 weeks ago

Excellent strategy.

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean yeah? That's how basic economy works - if a state gives people free money, they get to spend that money on commodities which benefits the economy in terms of GDP.

The issue with UBI is still that it comes from the state, meaning once the overall rate of profit inevitably starts dropping and state gets less and less taxes/dividends and has to increase spending, meaning cuts or abolishment of welfare programs such as UBI. States don't have infinite money, and UBI for a state is an expense, not a profit endeavour. It's why welfare states don't really exist anymore apart from the few.

[–] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yea, wellfare states are nice when the economy is booming but quickly run up debt when it's not. It's a nice idea, but not viable in the long term. In the end for each penny of government spending there needs to be a penny coming in from somewhere.

This can be largely mitigated by cheap financing but also then you see the inevitable downturns and the debt has accrued to unsustainable levels. Financing like that is passing the bill on to later generations (hard stare at the boomers).

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No shit sherlock, that's what injecting money into the economy does, almost irrespectively of who gets it (yes, even stupidly rich people). Then there's better and worse ways of doing it.

[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually, stupidly rich people is the exact kind of people you shouldn't inject money into : they already have all they need and instead of stimulating the economy, they'll just speculate with the cash.

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

instead of stimulating the economy, they’ll just speculate with the cash

That is also stimulation of the economy, although a terrible way of doing it and (at least in my opinion) leads to a worse situation even if economic activity increases. Bad money injection, causing misallocation of funds, is always worse than just doing nothing for the vast majority of people. Asset speculation drives risky capital ventures that try to find a way to monetize and squeeze more profit out of literally everything.

Throwing money at artists is... meh. I'd rather see it put to something more useful. Teachers, more staff at kindergardens, better healthcare...

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Stupidly rich people tend to just inject it into offshore bank accounts.