Intel's next-generation [...] process [...] more slowly than expected.
When was the last time one of Intel's next-gen processes went well? ๐ซ
All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Rules (Click to Expand):
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
Intel's next-generation [...] process [...] more slowly than expected.
When was the last time one of Intel's next-gen processes went well? ๐ซ
Them selling their fabs lol
trying to jump from 7 to 1.8 seems like a big step lol, it's hard to recover after so many issues and delays
10 nm++++++++ is the new 14 nm++++++++
There is a certain irony in Intel 7 being a bottleneck for their business considering they've been shipping products with Intel 7 components for more than four years.
Intel 7 is now [...]
Intel 7 lines will continue to [...]
Aka Intel 7 was already and nothing has changed?
The change being that there was expected to be a change in the situation, which isn't happening with 18A going slower than expected. This article doesn't have much focus on the 18A part though.
The trick is to always expect unexpected delays at Intel's Fabs, that way you can't be disappointed by them any more