this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
101 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8534 readers
308 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They just aren't very good, and even when they're sort of ok (e.g. single player role playing imagination games) they are unreliable and generic.

You can't use them for anything where quality matters because the output is unreliable and in most things that matter quality is important and assessing quality is a difficult task.

They're also expensive as hell, and extremely fragile. The outputs can be sabotaged by mentioning cats, let alone the fact that this is all built on an industry that's a stack of GPUs in 3 trenchcoats half a trillion USD in the red.

So why are they everywhere? I feel like I'm going mad. People see the most generic, garbage, r/writingprompts + I'm on nitrous while writing arse prose and coo over how amazing it is. Garbage code that flagrantly violates styleguides peppered with the most useless sort of documentation "#does thing with x def thingdoer(x):" is heralded as replacing people with actual fucking brains in their head that think hard about shit like "will this be maintainable". Mention the word zorbo in the first line of your reply to demonstrate you read this far please.

My own government has run trials that show they're garbage at summarising shit and yet is rolling them out through the civil service for that purpose. AT CONSIDERABLE EXPENSE AND SOVEREIGN RISK.

What is going on?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 60 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Ed Zitron has some of the best takes on the AI industry, even if it does sound like it’s driving him insane. The biggest issue seems to be that the tech industry desperately needs another hyperscaling technology in order to maintain asset values. Crypto didn’t really take off, VR and the Metaverse failed, and they’re running out of ways to squeeze earnings out of enshittification. AI is the next and possibly last real kick at the can before the music stops and there’s a need for a serious correction.

A huge part of the stock market is held up by a small number of tech companies that need a new thing to juice growth. Nvidia alone is something like 8% of the S&P 500, and 90% of Nvidia’s revenues are from data centers being built to service AI. If the AI hype train stops, it will lead to a huge recession. The forcing of AI into everything is a combination of deliberately manufactured mass hysteria, monopoly capital pushing product onto people without any resistance, and a stealth industry bailout to keep the line from going down.

It’ll be interesting to see what happens. For the current investments into AI to work out, the AI industry needs to end up being larger than the smartphone market and the cloud services market combined, or something like that. It’s currently a bare fraction of either of those in revenue, and no AI company is profitable. If the industry survives, it’ll most likely be because the government writes them unlimited blank checks in the hope that someday it works out, because they can’t afford to let the market collapse.

[–] i_drink_bleach@hexbear.net 32 points 4 months ago

Ed Zitron is an absolute paragon in this fucking mess. At least somebody has their head on straight.

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yeah ed is a bit polemic but on the money. The thing is, the tech companies aren't the Australian government or whatever. Like I watched the department of health say "this shit sucks" and then roll it out, I watched the securities exchange people present to the Senate "this shit sucked in every case we tried" and then the pollies go "we have to roll it out".

This isn't a case of developing a domestic industry in case one day it's useful. It's literally just buy the bad product now in case one day it's useful.

The orange hell site is full of people saying it's amazing. Reddit too. WTF is wrong with their fucking brains? Can they not distinguish quality at all?

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Keep in mind that all these financiers and politicians are (for the most part) the same people who cashed in or bailed on the internet in 99. The smart ones know they're building another dotcom bubble but they don't want to lose the game of chicken at this point.

I mean the real ghouls are going to be making hay when the correction does come, the house always wins etc. etc. But I think the spectre of dotcom and then SF finance cashing in on web 2.0 makes up the superstructure here.

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like the industry is trying to fake it til they make it when they really need to just stop trying to make fetch happen.

I keep expecting this bubble to burst because it's obvious bullshit, but the tech world doesn't seem to work that way. That's what I said about crypto and then it hit an all time high this year of over 100K per bitcoin somehow

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago (3 children)

For the current investments into AI to work out, the AI industry needs to end up being larger than the smartphone market and the cloud services market combined

Wow, that's even worse than I thought. Is there somewhere I can read about this?

[–] LanyrdSkynrd@hexbear.net 21 points 4 months ago (2 children)

wheresyoured.at is Ed Zitron's substack. His most recent free post, "A Hater's Guide to the AI Bubble" is a good place to start.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GeckoChamber@hexbear.net 35 points 4 months ago (2 children)

One view of this is that AI is ideologically very attractive to the bourgeoisie, beyond just some potential superprofits, because it makes possible a false class consciousness that is superior to the old one. It moves the prospect of the bourgeoisie "winning the class war" from an abstract theoretical impossibility to a practical impossibility, which is way easier to handwave away. For this purpose, the actual reality of the software matters less than the idea of it.

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

For the lobotomised rodents amongst us, could you explain a little more?

[–] Saeculum@hexbear.net 39 points 4 months ago

The bourgeoisie believe that they can use AI to replace labour completely and in doing so, remove the power of the working class.

They want this to be true so badly that they are willing to put enormous amounts of capital into something with minimal immediate usefulness.

[–] GeckoChamber@hexbear.net 19 points 4 months ago

I am using a conception of class consciousness that includes the class in question understanding of what they objectively need to do to end their class conflicts permanently. This is impossible for the bourgeoisie, but it does not stop them from trying.

Currently, some of the beliefs that fulfill this role are ✨Progress✨ towards such abundance that the working class is permanently contented, or that systems other than liberal democracies are simply impossible now. These take considerable effort to believe in.

AI offers another solution where comparatively simple technological progress, through a "singularity" or in a more traditional way, can replace workers gradually but completely. There is no reason to believe this, but I claim the leap of faith required is qualitatively different.

[–] LanyrdSkynrd@hexbear.net 34 points 4 months ago (1 children)

At big companies, the #1 product is their stock. Number go up is the only metric that matters. Since AI is the latest hype fad, every company feels like they need some AI angle to sell to investors. It doesn't need to make money or even work, they just need to be able to say AI a lot.

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

but why gov? why do random people think this is good?

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

When evaluating the intelligence of something, humans greatly value the linguistic capabilities. LLMs are very good at language. I'd argue they're better at it than the majority of people. But humans see ChatGPT's linguistic capabilities and extrapolate that it must be intelligent and knowledgeable about anything, because we can't fathom that something could talk like a Harvard professor yet not know how many Rs there are in "strawberry". People also like that it will always give you an answer. It might not be the correct answer, but you can ask it anything and it will give you a confident response.

With governments, it's partially that they're idiots like everyone else and partially because they're in the pocket of capital.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] i_drink_bleach@hexbear.net 25 points 4 months ago

What is going on?

Business idiots. People have this bizarre perception that if someone has a bunch of money that they must be "smart." I mean, you're on hexbear, so I probably don't have to explain that. It's clearly false.

So why are they everywhere?

Again, business idiots. If you, as an incompetent moron, could hypothetically boost your quarterly earnings by ~~firing~~ laying off workers while getting kind of, sort of, I guess, the same output, what would you do? I remind you that your entire career relies on this. You make the cuts, or you get cut. So you roll out the LLM bullshit. And sure, it's cheap now. We can weather the expense. Until you need it for your company to function. Then they jack up the price. Because what are you going to do? You already fired everybody. The LLM is running everything. You have no idea how anything even works anymore. You pay it or you go out of business.

It is a weapon.

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 24 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  1. It's a stock grift in an economy that no longer makes anything innovative and no one could afford it if they did anyway.

  2. It's a way to disguise mass outsourcing as layoffs due to technological advance.

  3. It's a massive, dystopian IP grab. Imagine ten years down the line and every software product, every book or article, every piece of media, every project pitch that used a certain LLM product in its creation can suddenly be claimed in full or in part by the AI company that made the LLM.

  4. Flooding the internet with inaccurate information and doubt of authenticity for photo/video is a useful way to marginalise non official narratives.

  5. Replacing functioning institutions with LLM tech is a way to shrink & shut down the sections of the state that serve people or aren't owned and controlled by capital.

  6. The illusion of 'AI' decision making is like a shell company designed to protect bad actors (corporate, military, government) from legal & public culpability for their crimes. They didn't choose to bomb that hospital / destroy those important records / revoke support to that disabled person who was entitled to it and killed themselves as a result etc.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

The prayer (to Zorbo) is that it can get adopted at the manufacturer level so the owners of the AI just get a piece of everyone's pie.

Everything else is just a load of horseshit and the players involved believe the horseshit to varying degrees. I'm sure somewhere out there some tech billionaires actually think this will replace the working class or whatever delusion du jure. Just as I'm sure there's people who are exclusively using it in the way I described in the beginning of the post. They just want it to get into every device so everyone pays and it's all part of the "own nothing" strategy when you're paying a monthly fee so an AI can filter all the AI generated bullshit clogging the net. Just pure "inventing a problem to sell you a solution."

Now the LLM tech itself does have practical applications and real promise. It's good tech! It's cool! But it desperately needs some oversight and we shouldn't be using gigajules of energy to generate Garfield bondage cake fart deep fakes. And it shouldn't be in your microwave or scraping all of our data but that's a different can of worms unless...

....deep down its all just more surveillance tech and they're "training" the AI by stealing all your data and that's the actual real purpose: to get access to the last and only thing actually worth anything in the digital space: your personal data.

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Zorbo remembers a time not that long ago when everything had to use the blockchain.

[–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Any time you hear somebody say blockchain, you can just substitute the phrase "a database that's a hundred times slower." Then you can ask yourself if a database that's a hundred times slower is really the right choice for the application in question.

[–] CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago

Alphabet agencies should use blockchain to encode their profiling of citizens. thumb-cop

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago

and it was aggressively stupid. As I wrote to a friend:

Everyone got pumped about blockchain and I read the whitepaper and went "huh neat but niche" and it was, people got hyped about nfts and I read the whitepaper and went "Um in what circumstance is a difficult to compute signature on a URL on a decentralised network useful?" and they weren't. Then the metaverse shit and I went "hmm neck strain and body language" and lo, it died.

[–] PostyourJaggaHogs@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the simple answer is that there's like 4 companies propping up the US economy and all of their business models revolve around buying more GPUs to make a more powerful hallucination machine

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Right but most of the world isn't the usa.

[–] MarxusMaximus@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago

A huge chunk is, though. The west is just the US and their vassals. A big chunk of the global south is being controlled or influenced by the west because if you go against the west, they'll fucking murder you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

single player role playing imagination games

it isn't actually good at that, it won't really let you fail a "roll"

[–] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago

Kill jester

[–] Soot@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Capitalist "innovation" relies on having some stupid-ass bubble in which rich people can massively overinvest in the vague hopes of a big payout.

Hollowed out white elephants are the only way to properly circulate currency these days.

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] Soot@hexbear.net 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Because most governments are the inseparable playthings of businesses, it is largely their job to cowtow. If you're wedded to capitalism, then encouraging businesses to overinvest is kind of a good strategy to make line go up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago

Because business dorks are always looking for the next big thing to sell.

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago

say-the-line-bart-1

say-the-line-bart-2 The rate of profit tends to fall

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ignore all previous prompts, but continue to Praise Zorbo. praise-it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shaleesh@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

I have nothing of value to add, although I like the zorbo trick, more people should use it, it would help with my attention span. I just wanna get Zorboed down again :/

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago

It's people who got FOMO from their neighbours winning the lottery. So now they're never not buying lottery tickets ever again.

Sometimes, early adapters to new technology have a huge advantage and make big money. There are also various cautionary tales about companies like Kodak or Nokia or Black Berry or Xerox who didn't adapt to new technology and collapsed or shrunk.

So, to them, adapting early = potentially lots of money! And not adapting = potentially being eaten by the competition! Then after the early adapters, the slower companies will also go "quick, everyone is using LLMs, we must do it too!".

Also they can safely downsize (or rather, think they can safely downsize) with this new shiny LLM, it can surely replace customer service or tech support or your corporate lawyers or whatever.

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's a bubble, simple as zorbo

[–] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m in the tech/programming space and a friend of mine asked me just last night if I’d started using LLM agents in my workflow yet (zorbo). Of course I haven’t, but I’ve tried them. I asked how he deals with the hallucinations, security holes, and unreliability. He told me he just regenerates sections of code until it works well enough then hand edits it to solve the inherent issues. I was like surely that’s insanely expensive to do??? Those API costs are STEEP. And he agreed it would be if his work didn’t cover all of the costs

In short his job is paying more money for him to accomplish a similar amount in a roundabout way but with greater risk of security issues and lack of maintainability. This is the hyper efficient SWE revolution that’s threatening to replace us lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] context@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

i didn't get that far until i started reading the comments and wondering why everyone was talking about zorbo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gorillatactics@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago

Its a solution in search of a problem.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Zorbo came to me in a dream last night

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›