this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
1113 points (99.4% liked)

Greentext

5261 readers
1944 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

We have lemmynsfw

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Fortunately, this is easy to work around, just get a VPN hosted in a didn't different state or country.

We have something similar here in Utah, so I have a WiFi network that is always connected to a VPN in a neighboring state. If something isn't accessible, I just swap WiFi networks and I'm good.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 4 points 1 hour ago

So what who cares. VPNs cost money and this is a question of basic freedom.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Honestly, these laws are just gonna hurt old men in Republican states. Like, I grew up with piracy, torrents, and old school forums. These educated me on computers enough that I made a career out of it. And most of that computer knowledge was gained because I wanted to see big tittied women sit on each other's faces. These laws don't stop horny teens from accessing porn. It just makes them better at it.

And this is definitely not one of the cases of "oh it'll reduce numbers overall though". No the fuck it won't. It's porn. They're gonna access it. Literally every YouTuber they watch is sponsored by a VPN.

The only healthy thing to do is actually talking to your kids about porn. Educating them on its potential harms. But Republicans don't ever want to talk to their kids. Ironically, these "drain the swamp" people just want daddy government to "prevent" their kids from accessing it. Which these laws don't do.

[–] daltotron@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

Honestly, these laws are just gonna hurt old men in Republican states.

You know I think a lot more of their politics and general life outlook makes more sense when you understand that probably a lot of these super old guys are not computer literate enough to look up their niche fetishistic porn interests, and are probably still consuming porn the old fashioned way, which is becoming increasingly nonexistent even though it's still something that actually exists. Plus the propagation of morally puritanical values means that if they kept any of that material around at all, they'd be hypocrites, so they can't have that. Probably a lot of these dudes are walking around super pent up and sexually frustrated, I'd bet.

We need to introduce local community college and library courses to teach these elderly boomers how to goon

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

These laws don’t stop horny teens from accessing porn. It just makes them better at it.

Exactly. And it punishes the responsible sites that follow the law and drives people to the sketchier sites that don't.

If you want more viruses and identity theft, I guess this is a good law for you.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. If these red states actually cared about kids they'd care about proper sex education. But I think this stuff just proves that Republicans are afraid of sex. They had an awkward conversation about it with their dad once and have been leaving their wives unsatisfied for 30 years since. They have no idea what to do if their kid actually came home from school and asked them what the difference between a clitoris and a vagina was. They are absolutely afraid of the female body and it's why they try to control it so much.

Sorry. A bit of a rant. If this was a different conversation I'd have plenty to criticize about the sex industry too. But these conservatives don't have enough brain cells to actually talk about the problems with it. So we have old men making laws that do nothing but make them feel better. Or it's projection for their own porn addiction.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

My money is on projection.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Column A and Column B for sure

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 117 points 13 hours ago (9 children)

The whole porn ban thing is probably my all-time favorite example of conservatives voting against themselves.

Meanwhile, in California, I can watch all the porn I want without registering myself in a database and walk down the street to the weed store. And the women in my life still have rights over their own bodies.

So I guess Democrats are actually the party of freedom.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

One of my fave porn vids got affected though.

— a Nord

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

B- b- but, California b-b-bad! 🥺 Don't you see how oppressed you are? You're really oppressed out there. 🥺

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

California is bad for voting to keep prison slavery and refusing to solve the housing crisis with a council housing system much like the UK used to have.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It’s all relative. Lots of personal freedom, taxed like a mother fucker.

As it should be honestly but there are many people that don’t see it that way and view taxation as a form of oppression.

[–] laserm@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago

who would've guessed

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world 84 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

Me: This is America.

Pornhub: This content is not available in your state due to ID verification legislation.

My VPN: This is Germany.

Eh, no need for crazy latency, just get one in Colorado or something nearby.

[–] adm@lemm.ee 30 points 12 hours ago

My favorite small example of this is trying to watch a video on YouTube. If my VPN is set to United States then im told 'You can't watch this unless you log in.'

I switch to Germany and like magic the video plays. So clearly they didn't need to confirm I wasn't a bot. They just wanted to track my viewing habits.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›