this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
848 points (98.6% liked)

News

25357 readers
3872 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Conservative lawmakers and activists are pushing to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage. Liberty Counsel’s Mat Staver declared, "It’s just a matter of when."

Some legislators, like Oklahoma Senator David Bullard, are introducing bills to challenge the ruling, while Justices Thomas and Alito have signaled interest in reconsidering it.

Though most Americans support same-sex marriage, the court’s conservative shift is concerning.

The 2022 Respect for Marriage Act ensures federal recognition but does not prevent states from restricting same-sex marriage if Obergefell is overturned.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Just more government fingers in places they shouldn't be from the party of supposedly small government.

[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 92 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Meanwhile a ton of conservatives are closeted gays

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If they aren't stopped, it's only a matter of time before women won't be able to own property, take loans or have credit in their names, and maybe even have bank accounts in their own name. Only men will be able to file for divorce. etc, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 77 points 3 days ago (3 children)

So ... when are they going back to legalising child marriage and removing divorce?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

Child marriages were never banned in the US. Hell, the GOP has been pushing to lower the age of consent from 18 already, and carving more and more pedo loopholes into the law.

Like, it's not being a pedo, if you raised her from aged 4 (ie, child from previous marriage), and married her at 16, because "She loves Daddy so much!". Or, it's not being a rapist if you're a good swimmer. And, well, divorce... That's pretty hard for some women, in some states, already.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Child marriage is already legal. We don't have to go back to that.

No-Fault divorce is already on the chopping block.

'Til death do us part' is gonna be the only option soon, just an FYI for my peeps in abusive relationships out there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 87 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I love how none of them ever had grandparents that got "divorced" before no-fault. You know what you did a lot of the time before no-fault if you wanted out? Killed your husband. Wives, when they were forced with a situation where they couldn't simply leave the state/country, would just poison their spouse. In the early 1900s, when your wife was often the one who was at home all the time, preparing all your meals, it was INCREDIBLY easy to do in a way that looked like "oh well he just kept getting sicker and sicker".

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Lack of no fault also meant you often had to lie about your spouse in order to get a divorce. Sometimes these lies were agreed to by the spouses beforehand, sometimes they were not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I've pretty much given up hope for the American people ever growing a spine and standing up for themselves, but if there's one thing I still believe can make things start happening it's if gay marriage is outlawed.

Though I will prepare myself to be proven wrong. That hasn't failed me before.

[–] Carl@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It'll go the same way it went for abortion. Red states will get worse while blue states stay more or less the same, which will prevent libs in the blue areas from mobilizing effectively to protect minorities in the red ones.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 54 points 3 days ago (2 children)

All while pretending to be libertarians.

load more comments (2 replies)

christian terrorists strike again

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›