41
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Definition of independent for the purposes of this question: source is not owned by a for-profit corporation, is not financially backed by any billionaire (either directly or via foundation or nonprofit organization) and is not financed by any national government (even if run without oversight).

It can have any perceived bias or political leaning.

Edit: Just to add it has to be written in English.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] x4740N@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

If you're in Australia then there is Independent Australia, they interview everyone including our racist parties (like one nation for example) alongside our good parties

I watched one of their videos where they interviewed australian political parties and I could tell one nation representative (one of Australia's racist bad guy political parties) was carefully wording stuff to manipulate the interview like they had been trained to do it

I stopped watching after that

I'd say their quality is low though from the one video I did watch

Here's information on Australia's media bias if you want it

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/filtered-search/?country=AU

https://imgur.com/how-accurate-is-this-chart-still-australian-media-INOCxxA

https://imgur.com/how-accurate-is-this-chart-still-australian-media-INOCxxA

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Try the BBC. Or the English channels of DW (Deutsche Welle).

Keep in mind that shutting down independent or opposing media is a top priority for any dictator.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

BBC

Are you serious? The BBC are literally a government mouthpiece, with a subversive right-wing bias. When Labour is in power, they over-report every misdeed, and when the Tories are in power, they maybe raise an eyebrow as the country burns. The last BBC director was a major Tory who received a sizeable bribe from his party during his tenure.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/mar/12/tim-davie-bbc-director-general-embroiled-gary-lineker-controversy

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

In the UK the BBC is hugely pro-establishment but their reporting on world news is fantastic.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

The BBC has been accused of being too far left. Often at the same time. In comparison to other English speaking news sources the BBC is quite neutral.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I'll compromise: they're about as politically neutral as the US democratic party is left-wing.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

This fits what you're looking for:

https://popular.info

[-] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 11 points 4 days ago

I like propublica and democracy now, but when you start talking about foundations, it's hard to know, they're basically all funded at least at some point by a billionaire.

That's kind of the thing that happens at least in the US, you either are big enough that some foundation gives you money, cause you actually need a lot of it to exist here, or you are so small that you can't cover the kinds of stories the other guys can.

This system is designed such that journalism not ruined by the need to be profitable is relegated to the whims of patrons, much like art in feudal Europe.

[-] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

I came here to promote those two outlets as well. Democracy Now and ProPublica are two of the only sources I have nearly absolute trust in. I still consume them critically, but I trust their work because they’ve been doing consistently high quality journalism for years. They’ve never let me down, so I throw them a few bucks whenever I can afford to. It’s probably not a coincidence that they both do more of the muckraking type of journalism than anyone else these days. When I think of ‘traditional’ hard-hitting journalism, these are the two I think of.

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

This is something else made so much worse by wealth inequality. The very wealthy have a vastly outsized influence on every aspect of the world. Being a billionaire, no matter how well-intentioned, is inherently a negative for humanity.

[-] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 11 points 4 days ago

NPR - National Public Radio. It's the closest you're gonna get for unbiased independent news. It leans left but seriously, you're not gonna find better.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Won't be around much longer after January.

[-] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 4 points 3 days ago

Please stop spreading misinformation and fear mongering.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

We will see. Eliminating unwanted press would fit 100% into the turds agenda.

[-] YoFrodo@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Ground news is an aggregator for news sources but it tries to show the bias of the news orgs whose stories it shows. This tool may help you find the independent sources you seek while also informing you of their potential bias and ownership

[-] x4740N@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately the social media pages for ground news are plauged with right wingers that turned me off from the site entirely

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

Paid, but even cheaper tier is worth it.

[-] YoFrodo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

It has paid tiers, but I've been using it for free

[-] camilobotero@feddit.dk 5 points 4 days ago

I think you would like 404 Media: https://www.404media.co/

[-] souperk@reddthat.com 5 points 4 days ago

TheGuardian is pretty decent.

[-] Mickey7@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I've read some good balanced stuff on "substack". But you have to pay for most of their content. I found a few real journalists there that will allow you to read some of their stuff no charge

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

The Lever.

Drop Site News.

Don't follow news sources. Follow journalists.

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Most journalists are still sitting on Twitter or those that got kick out from Twitter are on Nazi infested Substack.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

I didn't mean follow as in Twitter. I meant follow as in pay attention to them and the stories they work on.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Mother Jones is run by a nonprofit funded by reader donations. I'm sure some billionaires probably donate to it, but so do others.

[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

I listen to NPR often and I enjoy it, but it ultimately has the same problem as other mainstream outlets in that they are beholden to advertisers and, in turn, to extractors of capital. It leans left socially, but as with almost all other major news organizations, it is self-interested and will almost always support neocolonialist US practices. One tiny, not-the-best but temporally relevant example -- they have yet to call what's happening in Gaza genocide.

As someone else mentioned, there is Democracy Now!, they are viewer funded, but that is also supplemented by groups such as the Ford Foundation, which obviously has ties to capital as well. Still, Democracy Now! will give more of an "outside looking in" view of the United States.

I like listening to both NPR and Democracy Now! to hear both the US-centric (capitalist) points vs the a more global (and anti-capitalist) viewpoint.

this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
41 points (93.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27049 readers
2068 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS