386
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 36 points 5 days ago

Just like… why the fuck would you even bother lying when you could just say the truth and it proves the point you’re trying to make anyway? What a fucking moron.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago

He could’ve said $3 eggs, and he’d still be lying.

Egg prices are up across the globe because of bird flu. If the Biden administration wasn’t reimbursing farmers and increasing inspections, supply would be even worse, and prices would be even higher.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Egg prices are up across the globe because of bird flu

^^ This is the reason, but MAGA needs talking points desperately. They have been reduced to lies and Haitians eating your pets.
They would like to push the "border crisis" more but people might realize that the GOP is responsible for the crisis since they refused to pass a bill Republican Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford developed to resolve it.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 days ago

Across the globe is a stretch. They are 5% cheaper year over year in the EU and the recent week over week is within the norm for seasonal changes.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Prices across western nations are mostly floating in the $3 to $4 usd range.

https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/country_price_rankings?displayCurrency=USD&itemId=11&region=150

Also, to see the impact of avian flu, you’ll want a timeline that goes further than YoY data. 2023 was hit really hard by avian flu.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/APU0000708111

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 30 points 5 days ago

I mean, it's one egg. What would it cost? Ten dollars?

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 days ago

No matter how many men you put in front of standing desks, or how fancy an AI you give them, they can't make an egg. Clearly should be many millions per egg.

/s

[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago

If my time in tech has taught me anything there are going to be a surprising amount of eggs in that group of people at desks

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

King Dumbass finally found his heir apparent, Prince Dipshit

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

It's One Banana, Michael. What Could It Cost, $10?

[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

5 rows of 6 eggs is…..a hillbillly dozen?

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 47 points 5 days ago

The negative space between the eggs around his head in this image makes him look like he has pigtails. Saw it and had to punish/reward everyone else with it, too.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

JD Vancenstein keeping it kosher

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

The mascara isn't helping his cause.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago
[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 days ago

A trillion here, a trillion there, pretty soon you're talking about the kind of money his backers hope to loot

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

What’s a trillion?

Edit: /s. Though this might give some people an idea of how insane even a billion is.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 10 points 5 days ago

The ol’ Republican go to— regressive Fonzie in the 50’s “thumbs up” 🤦‍♀️

Fucking Happy Days and shit.

”Ayyyyyyyyyyyy!!”

What a tool shed

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

This seems a bit weird to go after when prices are around that in many stores:

https://www.walmart.com/search?q=Eggs

Plus tax.

[-] roy_mustang76@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago

Because the "regular" grocery store he's standing in is clearly selling them for less than that?

Seems like a pretty roastable unforced error to me.

(Also I know not everyone has options around them, but traditional grocers still tend to be cheaper on most grocery items than Walmart or Target, there is in fact a cost to the one stop shop)

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I mean yeah, but not every store sells for that price. The price he mentioned isn't a lie, it just isn't true in that exact store.

[-] roy_mustang76@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

Well sure, you can always find examples of something being sold for more than average (whether that's because of greed, human error, quality of product, or market strategy), but it doesn't make his statement accurate.

And again, yes I understand that Walmart is selling eggs at around that price point. I'm just saying that if I can regularly find eggs at my local Kroger-owned grocery store for $1 less than Walmart, when Kroger itself is a wannabe monopolistic entity, then Vance is probably stretching the truth as best, if you're uncomfortable saying he's lying.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

LOL, if you scroll down, you can see they can't even boil an egg properly. 😆 🤣 🤣

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

That's a painfully bad headline.

We have white house candidates talking about egg prices? Come the fuck on Michael, what could they cost, $12? Like I supposed to believe JD Vance has stepped inside a grocery store AND had to tally the prices in his head?

I want a new season of schitts creek I feel like this dumbass would be a great villain for their little podunk town, maybe he is buildimg a Walmart! Yeah he looks and sounds perfect for that role. He's gonna make us do a cheer every shift. Someone pants Vance. Make him the joke he is.

Hi fbi it's me Stan, just a joke, on a rhyme, call me if ur concerned, bro

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I mean the video was filmed inside a grocery store, claiming that eggs cost $4 with a sign directly behind him saying 2.99/24.

So yes, he’s stepped in a grocery store- at least once. but I’m pretty sure that actually makes this worse.

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

When there are so many very legitimate reasons to make fun of these people, I think we're getting a little nit-picky here. I know, the fact that he says it while standing in front of eggs priced $2.99 is low hanging fruit, but I just bought eggs yesterday at the cheapest store in our city and they were $3.76, so he's not actually far off the mark.

I think the more important thing would be to find out if egg prices are suddenly being artificially inflated by poultry farmers in an attempt to influence the election. If so, smack those fuckers down hard post-election.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

If you aren't going to call them out for blatant lies like this, then you can expect them to lie every time it would be to their advantage. Why on Earth would you give them a pass on this? I'm tired of this kind of lie being considered normal. This should not be considered normal.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It shows his blatant disinterest in fact checking or making the bare minimum effort to try to speak truthfully. He does not care if what he says is true, only if people will believe it.

[-] ccdfa@lemm.ee -1 points 5 days ago

Agreed. Someone also made this little graphic to demonstrate how nit-picky it is. The discussion in this thread is also about how we should be critiquing his claims about why egg prices are the way they are.

https://lemm.ee/comment/15021404

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 5 days ago

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
386 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18933 readers
2742 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS