this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
399 points (95.0% liked)

Science Memes

15847 readers
2696 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Argurotoxus@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Engineer: 2, but 3 to be safe.

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The budget is for 1.5, make it work.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Oh, hi Boeing Manager.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't they just look up the answer in a table?

[–] Argurotoxus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Nah not anymore, now you spend a day or so building some convoluted excel calculator once so that you never need to do the calcs again.

Then, 3 years later when you go to add or change something in that calculator, you have absolutely no idea how it works and decide the change wasn't that important anyway.

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

1+1=3 in cases of large 1's

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

ok, I define 1 as {∅} and 2 as {∅, {∅}}

proving the addition holds is slightly more complicated

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love the comment that it's "occasionally useful"

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm yes.. set theory... I don't understand anything happening here

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There is actually a really good explanation for us math-curious non-mathematicians here:
https://blog.plover.com/math/PM.html

That's some good read, thank you so much.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

+ is a map from N×N to N where a + 0 = a and a + S(b) = S(a + b) (S is the successor function that gives the next number).
Then 1 + 1 = 1 + S(0) = S(1 + 0) = S(1) = 2.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

seems a little sus to use + to define +

[–] apolo399@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

No, it's correct. You define the operation by it's properties. It's not saying that "a plus 0 = a" but "the result of applying the binary operation '+' to any number with 0 should give the original number."

  • is just a symbol. You could instead write it as +(a,0)=a and +(a,S(b))=S(+(a,b)).

You have to have previously defined 1=S(0), 2=S(1), 3=S(2), and so on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] porl@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really recommend the YouTube channel "Another Roof". His first few videos were building up exactly this idea, as well as building up all the real numbers (possibly complex too if I'm remembering correctly). Sounds like a dry topic but he uses humour really well throughout. https://youtube.com/@anotherroof

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

ooh, that looks interesting!

[–] callyral@pawb.social 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

1 + 1 is not equal to a question mark.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What did 1 minus 1 equal before zero was invented? 🤔

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, define "zero".

The one invented on India at around the Middle Age is a different one. The one you are asking about is very old.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You forgot accountant

"What do you need it to be?"

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

We need to report negative earnings so we don't have to pay taxes obviously

[–] hexabs@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm surprised the 6 year old knows factorials.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Not only that, it is mathematically correct, at least given the usual definitions of 1, 2, +, and !

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Error, float detected when int expected

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't put an expression on the left-hand-side of the assignment operator.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You need more expressive languages.

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Computer Scientist: 0 and a carry bit

Mathematician: S(1)

[–] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 8 points 1 year ago

Quantum physicist: Whats the uncertainty?!

[–] Aarrodri@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Terrence Howard : 2 !! Also 1x1=2 !!

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

How would a two year old know factorials?

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Math isn't induction. Its deductive logic.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Appliance salesperson: oven + pan = hamburger

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I appreciate the latex-style quotes around the mathematician's 1

load more comments
view more: next ›